Posted on 07/29/2010 11:55:57 AM PDT by Al B.
NEW YORK -- The cover photo for Sarah Palin's new book is a portrait in red, white, blue and gray.
(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...
Okay, man....you had me worried.
Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag?
Reflections on Flag is not good.
What was wrong with “Reflections on Family, Faith, and the Flag”?
“Ralph fail English, that is unpossible!”
So, you two going with Mitt ... or maybe, now that he’s hawking reverse mortgages for seniors on the cable channels, Fred Thompson ?
You will now be accused of it though.
Here on FR, if you like even one thing about Palin and state you think she may make a good President, you will forever be known (to some) as a Palinista or a Palin worshiper.
I don't agree 100% with anybody and sure don't like Palin's support of McCain but it doesn't matter to certain posters.
Like millions of others, I'm looking forward to reading Sarah Palin's new book but I'm beginning to think that the naysayers clinging to Palin's endorsement of McCain as a battering ram to attack and dismiss her must get paid by the post.
Although I believe there are honest motives behind some of the anti-Palin attitudes expressed here, it's telling that the always-present anti-Palin folks seem to reflect the left-wing's line on Palin, only instead of just calling her 'stupid', etc, a red flag that usually signals a liberal posing as a 'conservative', some apparently have taken to using Palin's McCain endorsement as their rationale for rejecting her. Interesting.
However, to angrily dismiss every other aspect of the woman's very well-known conservative political and cultural positions because she endorsed John McCain seems a bit hysterical and frankly, one wonders what kind of conservative politician could ever satisfy these posters. Likely none...unless of course, their anointed,'pure' conservative politician had absolutely no chance of winning a national election. Funny how that always seems to work out best for the Democrats.
...if anybody needs me, I’ll be in my bunk.
}:-)4
‘preciate your “manly” concern. ROFL!
What candidate would you support for ‘12?
I’ve lost my interest in Sarah.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$...and the fact that Sarah will no longer feel indebted to McCain
Or, couldn't afford the tuition. She was always a practical lass and she paid her own way with summer jobs to ease the burden on her family. I think that counts more than a Yale degree any day.
Allen West, Michelle Bachman and I’d still support Palin if she runs. I never sat at home trying to “teach Republicans a lesson”. The McCain support and his 20 point lead soured me on Palin. Not you?
I agree 100% with....ME! And that is the ONLY person I will ever agree with 100%.
Some day, these people (Palin-haters) will be mature enough to understand that as well.
So all of you people suffering from PDS will follow her no matter where she goes or what she says or does.
Where I’m from we call that a cult.
Allen West, Michelle Bachman and I’d still support Palin if she runs. I never sat at home trying to “teach Republicans a lesson”. The McCain support and his 20 point lead soured me on Palin. Not you?
Allen West, Michelle Bachman and I’d still support Palin if she runs. I never sat at home trying to “teach Republicans a lesson”. The McCain support and his 20 point lead soured me on Palin. Not you?
That is headlinespeak. It is perfectly permissible to eliminate articles (such as the, a, an) from a title, or subtitle to make it fit on one line.
America By Hate
Of Flaming Fags in Fits
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.