Posted on 07/28/2010 8:18:58 PM PDT by smoothsailing
By Christian Newswire
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Black pro-life leaders in Georgia today strongly opposed Governor Palins endorsement of gubernatorial candidate Karen Handel. It is with a heavy heart that we express our profound disappointment with Governor Sarah Palins endorsement of Planned Parenthoods benefactor, candidate Karen Handel, said Dr. Alveda King, (niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.) pro-life advocate and leader in the Black Pro-life Movement...
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
“She just picks the woman if there is one running.”
Someone send the memo to Kay Bailey Hutchison and Lisa Murkowski.
Alveda King knows what she is talking about. She is definitely pro-life.
The RTL movement to her is only political to politicians.
How many of those aborted babies in Georgia are black?
How about she could just stay out of it?
I contend that Perry was by far the most effeminate candidate in TX
Impossible. She’s todays Gladys Kravetz
You mean a flip flopping opportunist, don’t you? Just like Palin
It took only one day to trash Phyliss Schafly and Alveda King.
Will anyone be left?
And Amity Shlaes as well. Beginning to think the cultists are anti-woman. Or at least anti-conservative woman. LOL
From what I’ve heard, Alveda King didn’t say that Handel was “pro-choice.” She just said that Handel presided over a Planned Parenthood grant (that went to breast cancer screening}.
The “pro-choice” description (maybe deception) came from the writer of the title of the article.
If Im not mistaken, King only said that Handel presided over a Planned Parenthood grant (that went to breast cancer screening). I don’t think she said that Handel was pro-abortion.
The “pro-choice” deception came from the writer of the title of the article.
From what I’ve heard, Dr. King only stated that Handel presided over a Planned Parenthood grant (which went to breast cancer screening). I don’t think that King ever said that Handel was pro-abortion. Sure, Sarah’s not perfect, but I don’t think she’d endorse (at least knowingly) a pro-abort candidate.
The “pro-choice” bit came from the writer of the title of the article. Maybe the author was trying to bring about a bit of divide and conquer with conservatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.