Posted on 07/28/2010 4:23:25 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
Listening to him now....He is right on as usual.
The judge didn’t like the law and voided it for this reason, crafting a weak legal opinion to justify her decision. It’s as simple as that.
A liberal legislator wearing black robe.
I am not aware of any judge appointed or nominated by the clinton or obama cabal that would do right or better. Elections have consequences and we see the result of bad people being put into office. We can expect no different and no better.
Does this decision mean state and local law enforcement cannot respond to bank robbery calls, because that is a federal law violation?
Could we sue to prevent local police from responding to bank robberies? They’re spending local $$ to enforce federal laws after all. If I robbed a bank could I sue to keep any evidence I left behind like fingerprints, demand note, hair, or video images of my face private? ...like the “illegal” aliens recently exposed in Utah.
Just wondering...
Rush is right. The state should disregard the ruling and continue with the law forcing the federal gov’t to either arrest legally elected officials and defend illegal aliens or get out of the way.
Inappropriate
You noticed in the decision that illegal aliens need not carry immigration papers? This on the same day when I learned that “mortgage originators” must now be fingerprinted and registered in their profession. Unless, of course, they’re also illegal aliens?
Let me see...
This is a Government By The People and For The People (at least it used to be...)
The Government is selective enforcing the law...
Therefore, We The People should selectively obey the law.
This is a good example of why “case law” and “precedent” are such a crock-of-shit; instead of going to the laws themselves, they spout a bunch of history that is [at best] tangentially relevant... and then the case with dubious ‘reasoning’ is considered ‘prescient’ and may be used for some other judge’s faulty reasoning!
” ... You noticed in the decision that illegal aliens need not carry immigration papers? This on the same day when I learned that “mortgage originators” must now be fingerprinted and registered in their profession. Unless, of course, they’re also illegal aliens? ... “
Welcome to Kafka’s World!
According to a lawyer on O’reilly factor with Laura Ingraham the cops can still check immagration status just can’t be forced to. It would overwhelm the feds the judge claims.
and America takes another one in the........
rlmorel
“Inappropriate”
I thought it was funny...I think maybe I said that...
In other words, appeal, appeal, appeal!
What was posted? Pivate reply?
WE NEED A NATIONAL RALLY FOR THE 1070 IMMIGRATION ENFORMENT LAW THIS SATURDAY..or soon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.