[Responsibility2nd]

It’s temporary. But the final ruling? Will be the same.

Then it goes to the 9th Circuit. Then the Supreme Court.

Then the streets.

[SloopJohnB]

== Then it goes to the 9th Circuit. Then the Supreme Court. ==

What AZ is doing is known as concurrent enforcement: a person can only be guilty under state law if guilty under the federal law.

Correctly, the Lefty black-robed clowns at the 9th Circus Court of Appeals – the most overturned court in the system got it right and has gone along with that concept.

1st Circuit Court of Appeals - Estrada v. Rhode Island upheld Rhode Island procedures, reasoning that, in Muehler v. Mena, the Supreme Court “held that a police officer does not need independent reasonable suspicion to question an individual about her immigration status…”

And the USSC - De Canas v. Bica (1976): States may enact legislation to discourage illegal immigration within their jurisdictions.

[Digger]

It’s temporary. But the final ruling? Will be the same. Then it goes to the 9th Circuit. Then the Supreme Court. Then the streets.

Sadly, I believe you are correct.