To: sukhoi-30mki
Gee, that Lavi looks awfully similar to the Chinese J-10. Glad to see that US development money didn’t go to waste...
3 posted on
07/28/2010 4:35:34 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
7 posted on
07/28/2010 5:24:57 AM PDT by
SJackson
(most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it, M Sanger)
To: Yo-Yo
That lie has been long debunked.
I don’t have the time, or I’d send you the links. The J-10 is a direct descendant of the pre-existing chicom plane.
There is no evidence of a Lavi going to china, et al.
All those rumors started with a RUSSIAN military group that spread a rumor on Janes, and the Brits media ran with it, as a chance to bash Joooos.
8 posted on
07/28/2010 7:51:01 AM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson