Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lavi prototype refuelling

1 posted on 07/28/2010 1:55:05 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Don’t know what, if anything, could be done with this approach, but Israel would be well advised to diversify its critical weapons systems partners away from the US.


2 posted on 07/28/2010 2:02:34 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Gee, that Lavi looks awfully similar to the Chinese J-10. Glad to see that US development money didn’t go to waste...


3 posted on 07/28/2010 4:35:34 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What good are fighter planes when the enemy sits in the White House?


6 posted on 07/28/2010 5:10:33 AM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Brilliant Plan: Something about...

“Cutting ones nose off to spite ones face”

W


9 posted on 07/28/2010 9:49:33 AM PDT by WLR (Remember 911 Remember 91 Iran delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinna; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Stephen Trimble: I spent a week touring Israel's aerospace industry last November, which included a sighting of the only known survivor of the Lavi program. One of many things I came away with is a sense that Israel wants to return to the ranks of the world's developers of manned combat aircraft, rather than a niche supplier of systems and UAVs. Ex-Lavi program manager and minister of defense Moshe Arens writes in Haaretz today that Israel would be better off launching a joint development program with Russia and India to build a new fighter rather than spend $11 billion to buy 75 Lockheed Martin F-35s... France, with a great aeronautical industry, chose not to participate in the F-35 project. India, with a considerable aeronautical capability and a meteorically growing economy, might be another candidate. And there is Russia. Perhaps none of them would be interested, and perhaps all of them would be. It's worth a try.
Israel's overseas markets for fighters dried up, but India wasn't buying much at the time. Thanks sukhoi-30mki.
10 posted on 07/28/2010 5:36:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well it may be worth exploring the question from their POV, but I think they would find the answer is no. There are almost no potential buyers of such a Jet other than the partners mentioned. They couldn’t sell them to Arabs, and they couldn’t sell them for NATO deployment, so it leaves them in a consortium that would compete with the F-35 only in theoretical (and perhaps one day real) combat.

I mean if Russia, India, France, Israel and maybe Brazil build a competitive plane, they would be the only ones to fly it, and if there was a hot war involving these countries their plane would go up against the F-35.

Though you might wonder what capabilities Israel really needs. I got the sense they were buying the F-35 because of political pressure. AFAIK they would prefer and still want the F-22 which was never made available to them.

Do they really need the new fighter jets? Or would their money be better spent on anti-aircraft and anti-missile technology, and UAV bombers?

The only reason they would need F-35 is because Saudi Arabia will want some. US will give Israel money to give to the JSF developers because the Saudis will be paying cash for them. It’s a very strange set of circumstances.


11 posted on 07/29/2010 1:29:22 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson