Posted on 07/27/2010 4:25:53 PM PDT by TruthHound
While most Americans disapprove of Barack Obamas handling of the economy, far more think his administrations policies rather than those of the Bush administration would do more to improve economic conditions over the next few years. As Congress gears up for debate over the tax cuts passed when Bush was president, the public is divided, with roughly equal numbers in favor of keeping all of Bushs tax cuts, repealing only those for wealthy Americans, or scrapping them entirely.
In the latest Pew Research/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll, sponsored by SHRM, conducted July 22-25 among 1,004 adults, 46% say that following the policies of Obama administration would do more to help the economy improve in the next few years, while 29% say that following the Bush administrations policies would do more to help. Nearly one-in-five (17%) volunteer that neither administrations policies would help.
(Excerpt) Read more at people-press.org ...
Because of this, I am vowing to spread the word, until these Leftwing organizations fire these operatives hiding in their organizations.
Do not trust Pew. They stink.
It figures. Their polls always favor the left, no matter what. They're like News Week ( John "Vietnam" Kerry was supposedly winning in a landslide).
The Clinton tax hikes were also coordinated with a decrease of government spending of over 3% GDP coming from ‘Welfare REform’.
It was an incentive also when Clinton said, “The era of big government is OVER!”
Now, Obama’s plan is like a page out of Animal Farm. Looks like he doesn’t have enough ‘Boxer’s’ to work for the ‘common good’.
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money!
Starve the Beast!
The Clinton tax hikes were also coordinated with a decrease of government spending of over 3% GDP coming from ‘Welfare REform’.
It was an incentive also when Clinton said, “The era of big government is OVER!”
Now, Obama’s plan is like a page out of Animal Farm. Looks like he doesn’t have enough ‘Boxer’s’ to work for the ‘common good’.
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money!
Starve the Beast!
Why let the Libs define what the acceptable “choices” are? Why should we fall for it being a choice between Obummer’s god-awful poilicies and Bush’s schizophrenic ones (good in getting us out of the recession he inherited from Clinton and in growing the economy for a number of years; horrible when he signed everything into law that Pelosi-Reid wanted in the last two years)??
In a choice between the Reagan policies that created 20 million jobs versus clown-head Obummer’s policies, it’s a no-brainer.
Democrat Congress sine 2006. End of story.
This is good stuff.
I also really like the Far Side!!
Humor always makes me laugh!
Boy they really must’ve dug deep for this result! What did they do pol on only college campuses?
Is poison better than a pistol shot to the head? Both Bush and Obama are big spending socialists. Bush’s compassionate conservatism was as bad of a big spending, big government expanding policy that we’ve had since LBJ—worse than Carter and Clinton. Obama is much, much worse but anyone who thinks Bush did anything but damage on expanding government is fooling themselves.
More than 76% of Americans think obuma should get run over by M1-A1 tank treads or be mistaken as a the last kitty litter box on Earth with 100,000,000 cats waiting their turn.
Personaly I dont believe this poll. If you look at the sampling it just says
“In the latest Pew Research/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll, sponsored by SHRM, conducted July 22-25 among 1,004 adults, 46% say that following the policies of Obama administration would do more to help the economy improve in the next few years, while 29% say that following the Bush administrations policies would do more to help. Nearly one-in-five (17%) volunteer that neither administrations policies would help.
The adult voters who are they likely voters,registered voters,felons who knows. I just think the numbrs are all over the place and possible oversampling in one area or another IMO
Okay so I am confused “Results for this survey are based on telephone interviews conducted under the direction of Princeton Survey Research Associates International among a national sample of 1,004 adults living in the continental United States, 18 years of age or older, from July 22-25, 2010 (672 respondents were interviewed on a landline telephone, and 332 were interviewed on a cell phone, including 127 who had no landline telephone). Does this mean they interviewed 1004 or 1131
Pew had another bogus poll some years ago showing campaign finance reform as one of the top two issues. Their liars and should be ignored.
Pew Research is a Marxist/Progressive Groupthink Mindguard organization.
They live to lie, and lie to live.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.