Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rangel stands his ground ($1.7 million for lawyers so far)
Politico ^ | July 27, 2010 | John Bresnahan and Jonathan Allen

Posted on 07/27/2010 4:33:29 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

Facing an ethics trial that may end his 40-year congressional career, Rep. Charles Rangel grew emotional Monday, saying the investigation has “been a very traumatic experience for me and for my family and my constituents.”

But it may only get worse for Rangel in the coming days.

The House ethics committee will release the detailed results of its Rangel probe Thursday, and a special investigative subcommittee has already concluded there is “substantial reason to believe” that he broke House ethics rules.

Release of the report will coincide with the beginning of a “trial” of Rangel by a special eight-member committee, a legal proceeding that could drag on well into the fall, potentially becoming an issue for vulnerable House Democrats when they go before voters Nov. 2.

Rangel is hoping this trial clears him of at least some of the allegations, although his backing is clearly softening.

“He wouldn’t win a vote on the House floor right now,” said one House Democrat.

Top Democrats aren’t offering Rangel any words of support, yet they aren’t pushing him out, either.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland said they have not spoken to Rangel and have no plans to force him to resign.

But other Democrats are growing more nervous about the potential damage he could cause to the party in the midterm elections. These lawmakers want Rangel to cut a deal with the ethics committee and end the case — as rapidly as possible.

“Clearly, it’s got to be resolved quickly,” said a member of the Democratic leadership, speaking on the condition of anonymity. Rangel “needs to figure out how to make his actions not impact the House. ... From the House’s perspective, [ethics committee members] have done their jobs.”

“I think Charlie should think about what’s best for Charlie and his legacy,” said another Democrat, who refused to call for Rangel’s resignation.

Sources close to Rangel said he has not been asked to step aside by any of his colleagues or party officials, and he shows no signs of doing so, although the ethics investigation seems to be taking its toll.

“This is a very traumatic experience for me and for my family and my constituents,” Rangel said. “I can only hope that ... all the facts come out before my primary election, before my general election.” The New York primary is Sept. 14.

But Rangel faces potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal bills, all while he’s using his campaign funds to pay for his reelection. So far, Rangel has shelled out $1.7 million to his defense team, a total that will only soar in the weeks and months ahead.

Rangel is also losing two of his top aides soon, although sources close to the staffers said it had nothing to do with the scandal — forcing him to face the most crucial phase of the case without some of his longer-serving aides in place to advise him.

Pelosi has insisted on staying away from the controversy, saying she has not talked to Rangel about the case or his immediate future. Senior Democratic leadership aides said the speaker has no plans — either directly or through intermediaries — to seek Rangel’s resignation.

One Democratic leadership aide said such approaches “wouldn’t influence him anyway. He’s going to do what he wants to do, and there’s not anything we can possibly say at this point to change that.”

“The process should work its way through,” Pelosi told reporters Monday. “We can talk about it, but the fact is that the [ethics] committee has made its announcement and [laid out] its timetable. I think we just have to see how that ... plays out.”

“What I’ve said, and what I continue to say, is that the process is working, and it’s working properly, even for a powerful member of Congress,” Hoyer said. “I think what it shows the American people is that the system works as it should.”

Republican leaders have also said little about the case, but political operatives at the National Republican Congressional Committee have issued press statements bashing dozens of Democrats for accepting Rangel-raised campaign contributions.

House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence of Indiana said the ethics committee should simply “do its job.”

“The ethics committee has taken action and determined that the allegations are of such serious magnitude that a public hearing and a public vetting [are] appropriate,” Pence said Monday. “And I want to defer to the bipartisan ethics committee’s judgment in that regard. You know, the standard for members of Congress is to be above the appearance of impropriety.”

Congressional investigators subpoenaed dozens of witness and gathered thousands of pages of documents looking into the charges against Rangel — including allegations that he failed to report hundreds of thousands of dollars of income and assets, used his Ways and Means Committee post to protect a donor to the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service and failed to pay taxes on rental income for a resort home in the Dominican Republic.

The report to be released Thursday is expected to “be devastating,” said an official who has been briefed on the findings. This official would not detail the charges against Rangel but said that Thursday “is going to be a bad one for Charlie.”

A member of the Congressional Black Caucus said the outcome is less important than the charges themselves, costing Rangel any chance of regaining the Ways and Means gavel he has continued to insist is within his grasp.

“The die has been cast. He’s already taken the hit with the charges,” the lawmaker said. “The damage has been done whether he wins reelection or not.”

In a stark reminder of the political stakes facing Pelosi, Rep.Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the caucus - co-founded by Rangel - issued a statement urging members to withhold judgment on him until they see the charges..

“Any rush to judgment to short-circuit the ongoing review of Congressman Rangel by the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct will do a disservice to the well established processes of the House of Representatives.

“Attempts by Republicans and Democrats to presume guilt before the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct completes its review of the facts, which are only known to them and Congressman Rangel, violates the core American principle of the presumption of innocence," Lee said.

Pelosi has moved cautiously throughout the two-year Rangel scandal, fearful of angering the CBC, a poweful faction within the House Democratic Caucus.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: notaxes4dnc; notaxes4rangel
The report to be released Thursday is expected to “be devastating,” said an official who has been briefed on the findings. This official would not detail the charges against Rangel but said that Thursday “is going to be a bad one for Charlie.”

Have the popcorn ready for Thursday. Charlie the Tuna's going down.

1 posted on 07/27/2010 4:33:30 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Re: ($1.7 million for lawyers so far)

And I’m sure he paid taxes on that money too!/s


2 posted on 07/27/2010 4:36:07 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

All I can say is, Go Charlie!!!


3 posted on 07/27/2010 4:37:40 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Hey it’s just campaign funds, tax free slush funds.


4 posted on 07/27/2010 4:38:07 AM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Stripping motivated people of their dignity and rubbing their noses in it is a very bad idea.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Agree, Go Charlie. Keep fighting right through the election. Don’t let the man keep you down.


5 posted on 07/27/2010 4:39:43 AM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Stripping motivated people of their dignity and rubbing their noses in it is a very bad idea.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Agree, Go Charlie. Keep fighting right through the election. Don’t let the man keep you down.

I hope he doesn't listen to the white lady who is telling him to resign.

6 posted on 07/27/2010 4:42:39 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

He needs to be indicted , put in jail and have all his money and pension taken away from him.After the election of course.


7 posted on 07/27/2010 4:51:08 AM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Are there any more of Tim Russert’s kids around, preferably with a mic and camera?


8 posted on 07/27/2010 4:53:27 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Makes you wonder why these democrats go so far to protect their “public servant status” doesn’t it? And it always seems the democrats circle the wagons and hang in there in all their disgust. The right always seems to force out their own. Not too many hang on for dear life.


9 posted on 07/27/2010 4:56:24 AM PDT by b4its2late (Don't get married. Find a woman you hate and buy her a house. It's a lot easier on you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

This guy’s as crooked as a twisted colon and full of the same material.

I hope he goes down, and goes down hard.


10 posted on 07/27/2010 5:00:12 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Never trust anyone who points their rear end at God while praying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

I swear these guys sell their souls to the devil for power and a long life. To be a democrat means understanding what your leaders are about and knowing not to question it.


11 posted on 07/27/2010 5:04:21 AM PDT by Second Amendment First ("Stripping motivated people of their dignity and rubbing their noses in it is a very bad idea.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Rangel stands his ground ($1.7 million for lawyers so far)

Good. I want this to goto the floor of the House for a full knock-down-drag-out with the democRATs having to stand up and either defend him or bail on their buddy....

....preferably sometime in the next three months.

12 posted on 07/27/2010 5:19:11 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

He’s a democrat.

Did Ted go to jail for killing that woman?

Did Bill go to jail for perjury?

Will the Obamajerk go to jail for being the most dishonest piece of excrement ever to exit the liberal anti-piehole?

He’ll walk. Mark my words.


13 posted on 07/27/2010 5:20:51 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“A member of the Congressional Black Caucus said”: so one of the caucasians speaks...


14 posted on 07/27/2010 5:24:59 AM PDT by LRS (Just contracts; just laws; just a constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
All I can say is, Go Charlie!!!


I agree with that



Rangel-Pelosi

15 posted on 07/27/2010 5:32:36 AM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

No he’s not.
This stuff is a resume enhancer for ol’ Charlie, esp. in his district.
The only way they could get him out Congress would be to put him in jail. Personally, I think he could run from jail and still win.


16 posted on 07/27/2010 6:26:08 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
SADLY YOU ARE RIGHT !!!

Democrats live by 'THE RANGEL ANGLE'.....PAYING TAXES IS FOR REPUBLICANS ONLY!!

17 posted on 07/27/2010 6:51:36 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson