Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: No attempt to stop WikiLeaks news reports
Yahoo News ^ | July 26, 2010 | AP

Posted on 07/26/2010 1:05:23 PM PDT by SmartInsight

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: SmartInsight

Well, he said he was going to be the most open administration, I heard he even posted the nuclear launch codes on facebook.


21 posted on 07/26/2010 1:34:33 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

As Rush said, where is the Valerie Plame like outrage at who leaked this information. Real covert agents are endangered by this. Where’s the investigations? I want to see someone frogmarched!


22 posted on 07/26/2010 1:36:52 PM PDT by McGruff (How's that Hopey Changey thingy workin for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
"WikiLeaks posted 91,000 classified documents on Afghanistan Sunday"

If they truly are classified documents, why is Obama shirking his duty to defend national security?

23 posted on 07/26/2010 1:37:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

LOL, if WikiLeaks isn’t a Pentagon operation, I guarantee they are using it for intelligence jiu jitsu.


24 posted on 07/26/2010 1:38:57 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

It is all about this guy, who is negotiating our surrender to the Taliban, whilst working at Harvard U’s Kennedy School of Gubmint. Sad...

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/world/asia_pacific/michael+semple+afghan+reintegration+strategy+is+apostaliban+talking+liteapos/3717882


25 posted on 07/26/2010 1:39:15 PM PDT by RadioCirca1970 (Victory or Death in the War on Terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackv

The reports after Obama took office haven’t been leaked. It is obvious that the WH wants to embarass the Bush administration and could care less about national security.
It is time for them to go.


26 posted on 07/26/2010 1:41:25 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

I find this deeply, deeply troubling.


27 posted on 07/26/2010 1:42:00 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Yes, they could go through legal channels to stop the publish without a problem TODAY.

BUT they will not. Which means the papers were given not stolen.

28 posted on 07/26/2010 1:45:43 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

Ok, I guess I’m just a little brain, but help me understand something....back in the non-bizarro world days, wouldn’t this sort of thing have been considered treasonous? What if, back in WWII, the press released info about how we were going to go after the German army, what would have been the response? Would they have even ever considered doing such a thing? I’m trying to understand what the media’s motivation is here.... to totally undermine our military in a potentially devastating way? Every day, more and more stuff I never would have believed 5 years ago.


29 posted on 07/26/2010 1:45:56 PM PDT by Newton ('No arsenal is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.' -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Oh! That clever Kenyan bastard.


30 posted on 07/26/2010 1:47:21 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Will must be the harder, courage the bolder, spirit must be the more, as our might lessens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I think the end game here is internet regulation under the aegis of national security.

Bingo!
31 posted on 07/26/2010 1:52:00 PM PDT by crosshairs (Celebrate diversity. Own a variety of firearms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

I know your questions are rhetorical, but the answer is that the White House was where the leaks originated, of course, with every mention of Obastard carefully culled out.


32 posted on 07/26/2010 1:58:41 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

a. White House is source of leaks
b. Prelude to war crimes trials of anyone who knew or saw Bush
c. Prelude to government control of the internet
d. Perfect excuse to cut and run in Afghanistan (until the Chinese ask for help securing their new copper mines).


33 posted on 07/26/2010 2:00:19 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

I know of no post WWII case where the US govt attempted to supress a foreign news organization using a legal process. If you know of any, I’d love to learn about it.


34 posted on 07/26/2010 2:01:28 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight
...all ENEMIES, DOMESTIC and foreign...

We have elected an enemy party who is using the law to destroy us. Where are the OATH KEEPEERS?

35 posted on 07/26/2010 2:20:01 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The leaks are from activities during the Bush Era, our President Obamination is changing the subject back to Bush. This is a political move.


36 posted on 07/26/2010 2:36:40 PM PDT by All Blue State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Bingo. O-Blame-A’s “blame Bush” tactic is wearing thin on the public. He needs a new entity to place blame for the failure of “his war” in Afghanistan.. That damn “Internet” thingy.. This is a set-up for further restrictions on Internet freedom.. While we all agree that dissemination of classified information to anyone not cleared to see it and a “need to know” should be prosecuted on Treason charges, this will be spun to rally the public in support of killing Internet free speech (although this isn’t about free speech whatsoever). Another twisted, bassackwards lefty political set-up.


37 posted on 07/26/2010 2:36:51 PM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Under copyright laws it is done everyday.
These documents could easily be placed under copyright laws.
38 posted on 07/26/2010 2:38:33 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SmartInsight

At the very least, the administration should be working at plugging the leaks, determining the leakers, and countering and discrediting future leaks with false information that would as well assist in ferreting out leakers...


39 posted on 07/26/2010 2:48:08 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

I don’t think govt/public docs can be copyrighted, but I’m not an expert.


40 posted on 07/26/2010 2:52:02 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson