” 2) Fiorina [There’s a point. Did Fiorina’s oppenent have a shot when Palin supported?]”
Absolutely.
” 3) Steele [You expect her to lead an attack on the RNC chair?”
No, I would expect her to keep her big mouth shut, which she seems constitutionally incapable of doing.
” 4) amnesty [She’s supporting the AZ law repeatedly. Your criticism there is debatable”
Let us debate it then. She is for amnesty, only its “Palinamnesty” which is even more disingenuous, and also against the law.
Off to church, catch you larer for debate on the rest.
I’ll concede 2 and 3. You whooped me. I’m not convinced that she’s for amnesty.
But my general point still holds true. Our Founding Fathers also made horrible mistakes, far worse than anything Palin ever did. If they were alive today, should they be driven from modern politics too?
This is what really concerns me. Many good, bright, and hard working Palin supporters have given up on this forum. They’ve gone to another forum. They are good people who believe in someone who inspires them to do good work. Is that the goal here? To run Palin supporters off? The same could be done to Hayworth supporters over that stupid commercial.
I cut both Hayworth and Palin some slack. I cut Newt some slack. I’d choose Palin over Newt in a primary, but I don’t want Newt supporters driven out of the forum. Should Dick Morris be run off talk radio? He’s far from perfect, after all. Terrible miscalculations. I like him. Heck, I like Ralph Nader. He’s wrong about almost everything, but he knew enough to not worry about Al Gore losing. God bless him for that!