Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Barack Obama Have a Learning Disability?
American Thinker ^ | July 23, 2010 | Michael Applebaum, MD

Posted on 07/23/2010 3:03:18 PM PDT by neverdem

Does Barack Obama have a learning disability (LD)? It seems like an outlandish question to ask, but the actions of President Obama suggest that he may suffer from one. Consider:

Learning

Learning is "the cognitive process of acquiring skill or knowledge."

Intelligence is defined as

capacity for learning, reasoning, understanding, and similar forms of mental activity; aptitude in grasping truths, relationships, facts, meanings, etc. or

1 a (1) : the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : reason; also :the skilled use of reason (2) : the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (as tests)

There is a relationship between learning and intelligence.

Intelligence is measurable. IQ tests "are designed to measure your general ability to solve problems and understand concepts. This includes reasoning ability, problem-solving ability, ability to perceive relationships between things and ability to store and retrieve information."

Learning Disability

It follows that a learning disability affects a person's capacity or ability to learn or understand, to grasp truths, facts, meanings, and relationships. So what demonstrations of LD can we find in Obama?

Presidential Appointments

The president has recruited a number of key appointments who appear to have LDs.

Regina Benjamin is the Surgeon General of the United States.

Benjamin states that overweight/obesity is incompatible with health.

She admits that she is fat.

According to the definition she accepts and publishes, she is a health illiterate: "Health literacy is the ability of an individual to access, understand, and use health-related information and services to make appropriate health decisions."

Somewhere along the bucket brigade of learning -- i.e., "access, understand, and use health-related information" -- all the water spilled, since she certainly failed to "make appropriate health decisions." Hence, her self-recognized and personally lamentable fatness.

Clearly in the domain of sick care, health illiteracy despite medical training is evidence of an LD.

Eric Hampton Holder, Jr., is the Attorney General of the United States.

Holder is pursuing a lawsuit alleging that "the state of Arizona's recently passed immigration law, S.B. 1070" "unconstitutionally interferes with the federal government's authority to set and enforce immigration policy."

However, during a House Judiciary Committee meeting, Holder admitted to not having read the law, despite repeatedly voicing concerns about it, especially about "racial profiling." His statements must have been based on hearsay.

Holder's bio states that he attended law school and is in the practice of law.

In training to become an attorney, hearsay, a fundamental concept of evidence that is not new, is taught to law students.

Holder should have acquired a grasp of hearsay, absent an LD.

Timothy F. Geithner is Secretary of the Treasury.

Geithner is a person who demonstrated an inability to properly do his own taxes even with the help of a mass-market consumer tax preparation software package used by people without a financial background.

It would be expected that a person nominated for Treasury Secretary would be able to figure out how to do taxes, unless an LD was present.

Clearly, BHO was unable to learn how to recognize individuals qualified for appointment.

The Supreme Court and Professorship of Law

BHO claims to have been a professor of constitutional law.

[BHO] ... has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when he said, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."

He was not really a law professor. He was a "senior lecturer," though the University of Chicago (U of C), where BHO served as a senior lecturer, claims that he was "regarded as" a professor.

How one is regarded does not always determine what one is.

Persons other than constitutional law professors claim respect for the Constitution. Absent an LD, certainly at some point in his career, BHO should have learned that respect for the Constitution is not limited to law professors or senior lecturers -- e.g., The Founders.

In his 2010 State of the Union address, BHO chastised the Supreme Court justices for their decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.

... last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign corporations -- to spend without limit in our elections.

Justice Samuel Alito mouthed that BHO's claim was "not true."

Analyses of that decision, including ones by law professors with apparently uncontested credentials, support Justice Alito, not BHO.

It would appear that a U of C "constitutional law professor" did not learn how to analyze U.S. law. (BHO also should have learned about hearsay during his legal training, absent an LD.)

ADHD

In 1972, Jeremiah Wright became pastor of the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. BHO became a member in 1988.

Wright achieved some prominence for sermons he gave.

BHO claims unawareness of them and Wright's views. Wright and church members claim otherwise.

BHO admits that Wright was his spiritual leader, married him to Michelle, and baptized his children. BHO took them to Trinity United Church for sermons.

Assuming he cares about his children, it is reasonable to expect that he would have paid attention to the words from the pulpit and been aware of what his kids' spirits were being fed.

He did not and was not.

Further, assuming the same, one would have expected conversations between parents and children discussing the contents of the sermons, their takeaway lessons, what his children may have learned from their friends in attendance, etc.

It stretches credulity that in about twenty years' worth of attendance (around 1,040 Sundays, though he claims not to have gone every week), a number of them with children in tow, BHO never heard Wright speak "controversially" or learned of Wright's positions, either directly at church or indirectly from family, friends, newsletters, etc

Never -- unless BHO suffered from LD, or perhaps ADHD (or mendacity). ADHD is considered by many not to be a learning disability. However, LD can coexist with ADHD. And ADHD can be an adult condition, possibly from an undiagnosed childhood ADHD.

Inattention is a feature of ADHD.

This could explain how over the many years BHO spent attending church, the nature of Wright's sermons eluded him.

Anyway, LD, ADHD, ADHD-associated LD, or a combination, the presence of a condition inimical to learning is problematic. Those who believe in the exceptional nature of the office might say that this is even truer in the case of the presidency.

It is not beyond possibility that an episode or episodes of inattention or inability to understand will compromise the nation.

Perhaps one already has.

In the matter of the Gulf oil spill, some have suggested that presidential inattentiveness contributed substantially to the suffering and damage. Although others might argue that the delay was a variation of a brilliant political move (H. L. Mencken: "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed [and hence clamorous to be led to safety] by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."), James Carville, renowned for his political acumen, certainly felt otherwise.

The Harvard Counter-Argument

Some might argue that BHO's attendance at Harvard Law where he graduated magna cum laude is conclusive evidence against an LD.

They would be wrong.

BHO entered Harvard Law after apparently undistinguished academic careers at Occidental College and Columbia College. At Columbia he majored in political science and graduated sans honors.

Despite his pedestrian undergraduate achievements, Harvard Law gave him entry -- some suggest under intriguing circumstances.

He was elected to the editorial staff of the Harvard Law Review (HLR).

Election to HLR is not meritocratic.

Until the 1970's the editors were picked on the basis of grades, and the president of the Law Review was the student with the highest academic rank....

That system came under attack in the 1970's and was replaced by a program in which about half the editors are chosen for their grades and the other half are chosen by fellow students after a special writing competition. The new system, disputed when it began, was meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review.

The Harvard Law Review (HLR) "is a student-run organization[.]"

...the Review has two other goals. First, the journal is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. Second, it provides opportunities for Review members to develop their own editing and writing skills.

There are indications that as president of HLR, BHO wrote nothing.

Without a "paper trail" to evaluate his abilities, basically only his grades remain. His Harvard transcript was never released (neither were the Occidental and Columbia transcripts). His graduation magna cum laude appears uncontroverted.

A problem in exculpating BHO of an LD on this basis is that grades from Harvard are suspect. Grade inflation is apparently a perennial endemic. "Harvard honors has actually become the laughingstock of the Ivy League."

Law schools are not immune to creative grading.

And if one were to assert that the grades are still from Harvard, and the world regards these students as America's best, even BHO himself would have to assert that he "believes in Harvard exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the students at University of Bridgeport believe in Bridgeport exceptionalism" -- i.e., there is nothing special about a Harvard grade.

This essay is not offered as a professional diagnosis.

Michael Applebaum is a physician and attorney practicing in Chicago, IL. His website is www.surviveobamacare.com.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: cll

This deserves a Pulitzer BUMP...


21 posted on 07/23/2010 3:34:09 PM PDT by cll (I am the warrant and the sanction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
He has:

1. An ugly wife with bad taste and a big ass.

2. A habit of whistling his 's's

3. A communist hatred of America

4. A drug habit.

22 posted on 07/23/2010 3:36:09 PM PDT by Doc Savage (SOBAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

IMHO, Barrack Obama is doing exactly what he has been trained to do all of his relatively short life, and he is doing it rather skillfully. Do not underestimate Evil. You can only fight Evil with Good, and with Truth. God help us prevail against the Evil set loose within our borders. I doubt Obama cares what the people think of him. His very disregard tells me that knows something we do not know. See my tag line. Pray that we will have the opportunity to change the direction the country is being taken.


23 posted on 07/23/2010 3:38:12 PM PDT by Paperdoll (REGISTER TO VOTE THEN DO IT RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ivy leagues are a big business. You get more money passing everyone in the short term than kicking people out. Who cares if you ruin your reputation over 30 years or so. The guy’s making the $ will be long retired, wealthy to the point of not caring, or dead by the time people catch on. Even then, just charge a lot and people will still clamor to get in.


24 posted on 07/23/2010 3:39:10 PM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Two words I expected to see by now on this thread: Bell Curve


25 posted on 07/23/2010 3:40:27 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Is this a trick question?


26 posted on 07/23/2010 3:43:29 PM PDT by bigredkitty1 (March 5,2010. Rest in peace, sweet boy. I will miss you, Big Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yes, it’s was he passed because he was a minority!!!


27 posted on 07/23/2010 3:45:41 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
Bell Curve does not apply to minorities and liberal educators. Only applies to the poor white trash. LOL
28 posted on 07/23/2010 3:47:50 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Somewhere along the bucket brigade of learning -- i.e., "access, understand, and use health-related information" -- all the water spilled, since she certainly failed to "make appropriate health decisions." Hence, her self-recognized and personally lamentable fatness.

I think this detracts from his argument. Her weight is probably more a function of her genes than her food choices. Also, women do tend to put on weight with age.

As for Geithner, I doubt he lacked the ability to do his taxes. As a Turbotax user, I dont see how he could have screwed up the way he claimed. He had to override the program to do what he did.

29 posted on 07/23/2010 3:56:41 PM PDT by freespirited (There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

he has SOS. Stuck on Stupid


30 posted on 07/23/2010 4:00:19 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Nah — he’s just a Marxist!


31 posted on 07/23/2010 4:01:30 PM PDT by CaliforniaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
How one is regarded does not always determine what one is.

In this case, I'd have to disagree. I'm pretty sure he is what I regard him to be, but I don't want to get thrown off this forum for uttering the string of profanities I'd have to use to describe him.

32 posted on 07/23/2010 4:04:06 PM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All
Photobucket
33 posted on 07/23/2010 4:08:11 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping


34 posted on 07/23/2010 4:19:12 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZirconEncrustedTweezers

Ditto


35 posted on 07/23/2010 4:20:18 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

36 posted on 07/23/2010 4:27:56 PM PDT by 4Liberty ( How do you spell "moral hazard"?: $ 19, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman

37 posted on 07/23/2010 4:28:58 PM PDT by 4Liberty ( How do you spell "moral hazard"?: $ 19, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
Two words I expected to see by now on this thread: Bell Curve

My first thought too. The book "angered" the left also. LOL

38 posted on 07/23/2010 4:31:25 PM PDT by Hillbillary (I know how to deal with Communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Wait -- Teleprompters -- at a GRADE School appearance? . . . Really ?. . .
39 posted on 07/23/2010 4:33:28 PM PDT by 4Liberty ( How do you spell "moral hazard"?: $ 19, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pissant

40 posted on 07/23/2010 4:36:56 PM PDT by 4Liberty ( How do you spell "moral hazard"?: $ 19, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0, 0 0 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson