Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A_Former_Democrat

I do not consider 170 to 370 a year to be wealthy. It’s definitely upper-middle class, but that person’s not going out to buy extravagant properties, build impressive buildings, or get rich in land speculation.


32 posted on 07/22/2010 1:38:37 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
The first fallacy of their "wealthy" claim is that they are speaking of income, not wealth. This does nothing to the wealthy--it hits those who are trying to better themselves (i.e., income) and promotes keeping the class divisions as they are.

Republicans are idiots for not throwing that back at Dems everytime they push for their progressive income taxes--that they are just trying to keep people in their place.

43 posted on 07/22/2010 1:52:56 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson