Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newspaper Enlists Startup To Police Web For Copyright Violations
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/index.cfm?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=126721 ^ | Thursday, April 22, 2010, 7:13 PM | Wendy Davis

Posted on 07/21/2010 12:09:10 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: JerseyHighlander

Righthaven LLC v. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Has Decisions
Filed: March 15, 2010 as 2:2010cv00351 Updated: July 13, 2010 06:37:41
Last Document Filed: March 15, 2010
Plaintiff: Righthaven LLC
Defendant: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
Presiding Judge: Judge Lloyd D. George
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
Court: Ninth Circuit > Nevada > District Court
Type: Intellectual Property > Copyright

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/2:2010cv00351/72150/

ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 36 Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 7/9/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)


61 posted on 07/22/2010 8:34:51 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Remember, guys, the enemy is to the left and the middle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; betty boop; xzins; Jim Robinson
What is interesting is that Righthaven would appear to have no actual damages. If someone re-posts one of these newspaper articles, the only legitimate entity which could claim damages would be the newspaper or the author, who misses out on hits to their website thus losing potential advertising revenue. Righthaven is not collecting revenue for selling the articles, they are collecting on the lawsuits (and I imagine they are sharing the revenue with the newspapers as part of the deal to transfer ownership of the copyright to Righthaven).

Aha!

As I recall, one must establish actual damages in order to sustain a lawsuit in Federal Court.

You may have hit the bullseye on how to get a Summary Judgment for dismissal and costs.

Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

62 posted on 07/22/2010 9:15:51 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; B4Ranch; Alamo-Girl; betty boop

see #61

Could that dismissal with prejudice make Righthaven’s action against FR a frivolous suit?


63 posted on 07/22/2010 9:25:36 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

They sue a form like ours? Naw, I donty want to poast anything from them.They have the marketing acumen of a pile of rocks.

Its the old Stephan Jobs, Bill Gates dichotomy,. We know how that went.

They plan tomake money by subrogatong their suit rights to a swparate commpany designed purposefully for litigation.

Naw, that rag can die. Buh Bye!


64 posted on 07/22/2010 11:15:02 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is fascist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

News reports say that NORML settled out of court. Not sure if the amount was disclosed, but they wrote this guy a check.


65 posted on 07/22/2010 11:27:04 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: xzins; B4Ranch; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; Jim Robinson
see #61 Could that dismissal with prejudice make Righthaven’s action against FR a frivolous suit?

Generally a "voluntary dismissal with prejudice" means that the parties settled the case. That would mean that NORML paid these worms to drop their suit. This is the whole reason they file these suits. They hope that they can extort a settlement.

This worked in California with the Trevor Law Group who was filing hundreds of frivolous suits and settling them all for something like $5000 which the defendants were more than happy to pony up instead of paying $25,000 to an attorney to defend the claims.

Eventually they sued the wrong people and the State began an investigation which ended up in all of those lawyers losing their licenses.

Maybe by suing Free Republic they have bitten off more than they can chew.

In the meantime is there some way we can start a boycott of the advertisers on the Las Vegas Journal Review? We should start posting the names of the principle advertisers for LVJR and then make it a point to have all the blogs and news forums in the United States boycott every one of their advertisers until they call off the Righthaven dogs. The fact is that LVJR did not suffer any damages for the alleged copyright violations. But they just may suffer a lot of damages if all the newsforums and blogs that care about the dissemination of information and freedom of speech suddenly looked upon the LVJR as a pariah. Righthaven is nothing but a bunch of thugs. The fact that LVJR hired them to be THEIR thugs makes LVJR worse than the thugs they hired.

66 posted on 07/22/2010 1:00:20 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

From:

http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=129625

“The advocacy group National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws has settled a lawsuit brought by copyright enforcement outfit Righthaven by agreeing to pay $2,185.

The settlement resolves a lawsuit filed in March against the nonprofit by Righthaven for allegedly infringing copyright to three Las Vegas Review-Journal articles. “


67 posted on 07/22/2010 1:06:55 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Jim Robinson; B4Ranch; xzins; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; mnehring; Admin Moderator

Irony of ironies, but FreeRepublic copyright and posting rules prohibit us from posting stories from Wired, but this one deserves a look. Here is our Nemesis, the face of evil, our adversary. A rally cry should go forth.

Admin Moderator: if I have transgressed the restrictions, pull this thread and send me to time out. I beg forgiveness, etc, etc.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/tag/righthaven/


68 posted on 07/22/2010 5:05:28 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Please add me to your ping list. :)


69 posted on 07/27/2010 7:18:11 AM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson