[Congressman Billybob]

You got that right. This state law that purports to change the express terms of the US Constitution is facially unconstitutional on several different grounds. The most basic one is that it seeks to override the decisions of the people of a state in favor of the decisions of people from other states.

It is hard to imagine a more fundamental affront to the whole political/constitutional history of the United States than this provision.

John / Billybob

PS: Request for help. Please give me a link to the instruction page on html for posting on FR. I need to find out, once again, how to post a link to a FR thread as part of my signatures on FR posts. — John

[DaveTesla]

Hyperlinks:
http://w3schools.com/html/html_links.asp

HTML Images:
http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_images.asp

HTML 4.01 / XHTML 1.0 Reference
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/default.asp

PS. I look for your posts on constitutional issues like this.
Your opinion is valued.
I would like to know what your thoughts are on the recent court ruling on Arizona's immigration law.
Haven't seen you post anything.