Posted on 07/21/2010 10:41:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Productivity growth is strong, monetary policy is easy, inventories are thin and corporate profits are growing.
There have been three distinct, and very diverse, sets of economic forecasts circulating in the past year. First, the end of the world forecast--call it, Depression II. Second, the "new normal" forecast of weak and anemic growth. And third, our expectation of a V-shaped recovery and relatively strong 4% real gross domestic product growth.
With GDP scheduled for release next week, our estimate for annualized second- quarter real GDP growth is 3.5%. This is a significant reduction from our 5.5% forecast (made back in March). What's interesting is that the Depression II and new-normal crowds have been emboldened by this.
But this makes little sense. One year ago today, the consensus of all forecasters was that the U.S. would grow at an average annual rate of 2% in the second half of 2009 and first half of 2010. We were forecasting 4%.
Since mid-2009, U.S. real GDP has grown at an annual rate of 3.5%--exactly where we have Q2 growth. In other words, the economy is certainly not in Depression, and growth is nearly double what the new normal forecast expected.
Yes, some of this growth has been due to inventories. But that is normal for every recovery, and the economy is now showing broader strength. Our forecast for Q2 includes a 3% growth rate for final sales (excluding inventories), the fastest for any quarter so far in the recovery.
We see no need to change our forecast. Productivity growth is strong, monetary policy is (and will continue to be) easy, inventories are razor-thin, and corporate profits are growing rapidly. For the next four quarters, ending in mid-2011, we again anticipate growth at around a 4% rate.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
Here are the assumptions behind the Forbes author’s estimate of 3.5% real GDP growth in Q2.
* Consumption: Retail sales grew at a 4.1% rate in Q2. Factoring in services and then adjusting for inflation, we estimate a 2.3% annual rate of consumption growth in Q2. At 71% of the economy, this will add 1.6 points to GDP (71% of 2.3 equals 1.6).
* Home Building: The number of new homes under construction probably fell again in Q2, but home completions—when much value is added—soared in Q2. In addition, home improvements rose steeply in late 2009 and early 2010 and likely continued to grow. As a result, we think overall residential construction increased at a 16% rate in Q2. But at only 2.4% of the economy, this adds only 0.4 points to the GDP growth rate (2.4% of 16 equals 0.4).
* Business Investment: Investment appears to have grown at an 11% annual rate in Q2, the fastest pace in three years and on par with the late 1990s economic boom. Equipment and software increased at about a 14% annual rate while even commercial construction increased slightly. Overall, with business investment comprising 9.4% of the economy, this adds one full point to GDP growth (9.4% of 11 equals 1).
* Trade: Despite long-term dollar depreciation, a larger trade deficit will subtract 0.7 points from GDP growth in Q2, the third expansion of the trade deficit in four quarters. This suggests the direction of the trade balance is even more sensitive to U.S. economic growth and less sensitive to exchange rates than we had previously estimated.
* Inventories: In 2008-2009, companies cut inventories by $134 billion, by far the largest reduction (even relative to GDP) since World War II. Companies increased inventories by $10 billion in Q1, and we estimate a $15 billion increase in Q2, adding 0.5 points to GDP growth. Part of this increase in inventories is due to falling prices, especially for commodities, which increases the real value of inventories.
Adding up all these components of GDP gets you to their forecast of 3.5% real growth in Q2, slightly above the 50-year average growth rate of the U.S. economy.
These are not depression-like numbers the way doom-sayers want to make it out to be.
Here are the assumptions behind the Forbes author’s estimate of 3.5% real GDP growth in Q2.
* Consumption: Retail sales grew at a 4.1% rate in Q2. Factoring in services and then adjusting for inflation, we estimate a 2.3% annual rate of consumption growth in Q2. At 71% of the economy, this will add 1.6 points to GDP (71% of 2.3 equals 1.6).
* Home Building: The number of new homes under construction probably fell again in Q2, but home completions—when much value is added—soared in Q2. In addition, home improvements rose steeply in late 2009 and early 2010 and likely continued to grow. As a result, we think overall residential construction increased at a 16% rate in Q2. But at only 2.4% of the economy, this adds only 0.4 points to the GDP growth rate (2.4% of 16 equals 0.4).
* Business Investment: Investment appears to have grown at an 11% annual rate in Q2, the fastest pace in three years and on par with the late 1990s economic boom. Equipment and software increased at about a 14% annual rate while even commercial construction increased slightly. Overall, with business investment comprising 9.4% of the economy, this adds one full point to GDP growth (9.4% of 11 equals 1).
* Trade: Despite long-term dollar depreciation, a larger trade deficit will subtract 0.7 points from GDP growth in Q2, the third expansion of the trade deficit in four quarters. This suggests the direction of the trade balance is even more sensitive to U.S. economic growth and less sensitive to exchange rates than we had previously estimated.
* Inventories: In 2008-2009, companies cut inventories by $134 billion, by far the largest reduction (even relative to GDP) since World War II. Companies increased inventories by $10 billion in Q1, and we estimate a $15 billion increase in Q2, adding 0.5 points to GDP growth. Part of this increase in inventories is due to falling prices, especially for commodities, which increases the real value of inventories.
Adding up all these components of GDP gets you to their forecast of 3.5% real growth in Q2, slightly above the 50-year average growth rate of the U.S. economy.
These are not depression-like numbers the way doom-sayers want to make it out to be.
No mention of the financial “reform” bill, the upcoming ramifications of the health care fiasco, or the coming expiring tax cuts.
My opinion? There might be a brief uptick in the economy that occurs despite the “stimulous”. Kind of like the last gasp of a dying man. A little interlude that occurs while reality catches up with fantasy.
And then maybe a few more people will wake up.
Westbury is a nice guy but he is sounding like a fool. Forbes magzine helped make one of their columnists very rich and he is Obama’s closest advisor and bakrolled Obama. I will never read Forbes again. Sad.
Good observations. I agree.
With Republican victory in November it is possible to check the lunacy that is Mr. Skittles. With gridlock established, confidence in the private sector can happen. Don’t look for any pro-business, pro-investment legislation until post 2012. If the pubbies do nothing more that investigate and cut spending for the next two years they can assure themselves the WH. Don’t focus on Mr. Skittles, just focus on all those pesky appointed Czars. It is real hard to build sympathy for someone holding the title “Czar”.
I see no mention of the effect that the elimination of the Bush tax cuts will have on the economy next year and how many companies are taking advantage of it this year.
Why is that? Because - they don't think it matters. Neo-Keynesian economists have convinced themselves that public debt has no negative long-term consequences because we can never pay it back anyway. Somewhere, Milton Friedman is laughing, and then maybe crying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.