To: Jim Robinson
Here is a link to the lawsuit document:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34611671/RIGHTHAVEN-LLC-v-FREE-REPUBLIC-LLC-1-Complaint-Gov-uscourts-nvd-74859-1-0 Among the multiple things they are demanding in the "Prayer for Relief" section, this caught my eye, on page #9:
3. Direct GKG and any successor domain name registrar for the Domain to lock the Domain and transfer control of the Domain to Righthaven
Reading the above, it seems to my non-lawyer eye that these twits want to shut FR down and to own the FR domain.
Any legal minds want to read and interpret?
195 posted on
07/20/2010 8:21:25 PM PDT by
onemiddleamerican
(FUBO - and all your terrorist buddies, too!)
To: onemiddleamerican
That’s how it looks to my non-legal mind also.
200 posted on
07/20/2010 8:51:26 PM PDT by
kristinn
(I am a footnote in Sean Hannity's new book, Conservative Victory. Pgs 239, 240)
To: onemiddleamerican; kristinn
Guys, the intertoobs is too vast for that. Say someone effectively locked down a given domain name. You could add the word NEW, TWO, REVAMPED, GEN2, or any little variation thereof. New domain name.
This will not be the way Obama, Reid, or Pelosi takes down the opposition.
207 posted on
07/20/2010 9:39:28 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson