She is speaking about her reaction to an irritating person 24 years ago before she started to work for the USDA. Whether or not her opinions have changed since is an open question but her comments are not reasonably commensurate with a forced resignation, IMHO.
I wonder if the 'breadth of the story' was told that night and edited out of the video, or did she just relate that part after she was exposed to mitigate her statements. It is a big difference.
I heard yesterday that reporters calling her office were told that they were 'working on a response', which sounds suspicious.