Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Question Liberal Authority
"We thank those who brought this to our national office's attention, as there are hundreds of local fund raising dinners each year."

He gets out of acknowledging her stupid comments by stating that there are hundreds of local fund raisers each year. My suggestion to Jealous is this: Demand a copy of the tapes of each dinner to be audited by BREITBART first. If more instances are found, and are each in turn condemned, then I will be more receptive to apologies by Jealous.

21 posted on 07/19/2010 10:17:20 PM PDT by Enterprise (As a disaster unfolds, a putz putts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

There are also hundreds of tea parties, he probably doesn’t care to take that into an account.


29 posted on 07/19/2010 10:21:10 PM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise
My suggestion to Jealous is this: Demand a copy of the tapes of each dinner to be audited by BREITBART first.

The NAACP won't even release the text of THEIR OWN RESOLUTION, condemning the Tea Party for alleged racism.

Worst. Open and honest dialogue about race. Ever.
31 posted on 07/19/2010 10:22:07 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority ("We can't control nature" - Barack Obama, Feb 27, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise
"We thank those who brought this to our national office's attention, as there are hundreds of local fund raising dinners each year."

Yeah, well there were thousands of local Tea Parties this year with zero documented cases of racism, zero individuals identified as acting racially, and that didn't stop the NAACP from condemning the entire nationwide movement as racist.
41 posted on 07/19/2010 10:30:36 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority ("We can't control nature" - Barack Obama, Feb 27, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

I think the expectation of Tea Partiers was that they disavow or disassociate from the supposed sign carriers (I know some were plants but what about others?). Note that the NAACP isn’t disavowing itself from the kind of people who would ‘appreciate’ that woman for practicing racial bigotry; the NAACP expresses ‘concern’. Certainly ‘concern’ would not have been enough for the Tea Party if a Caucasian stood up and advocated unfair distribution of tax monies based on race. The Dems and NAACP want to portray the Tea Party as based on racism but point an actual racial bigot receiving an NAACP AWARD from the GA chapter, for heavens sake, and that is relegated to ‘fringe’ local dinners, hundreds of dinners per year. How many state award dinners are there? (depends who you ask, some politicians would say 57) Weren’t there thousands of protesters NOT carrying offensive signs and internet posts by lefties bragging about crashing the Tea Parties with racist signs? I guess he can only be ‘concerned’ by that performance of the NAACP state awards dinner because there’s bound to be more videos of more places (can’t disavow too many!) - or so Breitbart seems to hint. So the NAACP is ‘concerned’ by some in the audience who approved of her bigotry - are they concerned about all the others who continue to attend events and who did not contact the NAACP headquarters or the media before now? And how does concern ‘operate’? It doesn’t; at most it is a very soft indication that one should not be so blatant in this age of cell phones. ‘Concern’ is when you talk to children about being aware that some are less fortunate etc. These are adults who listened with approval to a story about the government practicing racial discrimination.


58 posted on 07/19/2010 11:35:14 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson