I think the expectation of Tea Partiers was that they disavow or disassociate from the supposed sign carriers (I know some were plants but what about others?). Note that the NAACP isn’t disavowing itself from the kind of people who would ‘appreciate’ that woman for practicing racial bigotry; the NAACP expresses ‘concern’. Certainly ‘concern’ would not have been enough for the Tea Party if a Caucasian stood up and advocated unfair distribution of tax monies based on race. The Dems and NAACP want to portray the Tea Party as based on racism but point an actual racial bigot receiving an NAACP AWARD from the GA chapter, for heavens sake, and that is relegated to ‘fringe’ local dinners, hundreds of dinners per year. How many state award dinners are there? (depends who you ask, some politicians would say 57) Weren’t there thousands of protesters NOT carrying offensive signs and internet posts by lefties bragging about crashing the Tea Parties with racist signs? I guess he can only be ‘concerned’ by that performance of the NAACP state awards dinner because there’s bound to be more videos of more places (can’t disavow too many!) - or so Breitbart seems to hint. So the NAACP is ‘concerned’ by some in the audience who approved of her bigotry - are they concerned about all the others who continue to attend events and who did not contact the NAACP headquarters or the media before now? And how does concern ‘operate’? It doesn’t; at most it is a very soft indication that one should not be so blatant in this age of cell phones. ‘Concern’ is when you talk to children about being aware that some are less fortunate etc. These are adults who listened with approval to a story about the government practicing racial discrimination.
I think this particular target was even bigger than Brietbart knew. The incident raises a question: How many other multi-million dollar “settlements” does the Government award? Are many of the “settlements” true lawsuits or are they disguised grants based on race? How hard does the Government fight these disputes? Sherrod was clearly expendable. She didn’t really need the job because she already had 13 million dollars. As some have hinted about her behavior, it is the tip of the iceberg. But I think that these “settlements” are also suspicious and are also the tip of the iceberg.