Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: livius

This is a crime. There should be some expectation from the Court that the ex-spouse develop a career and become self sufficient. The child is one thing, the ex-spouse is another.


5 posted on 07/18/2010 7:56:10 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dhs12345

She was in the process of preparing another appeal to the court but she wasn’t very hopeful. She had supported him during part of their marriage (which was actually not even very long) because he was going to school. And this was the rationale of the judge, that if she supported him then, she should continue to support him later. He simply said he’d decided not to work after he graduated, and that was that.

Amazing.


9 posted on 07/18/2010 8:02:24 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: dhs12345

texas has post-divorce maintenance under very limited circumstances, for no more than 3 years. Encourages the ex to get job training.


19 posted on 07/18/2010 8:19:22 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson