Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Pack Knight

It sounded in the article as if they were going to be using it not just on civilians but on actual enemy forces, too.


60 posted on 07/18/2010 12:37:52 PM PDT by ottbmare (Off-the-Track Thoroughbred Mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: ottbmare

I’d have a hard time believing that, especially out of the Marine Corps. They might use it as I once heard another Marine Officer many years ago describe the Corps’ stance on non-lethal weapons: “We’ll use them if they help us close with and destroy the enemy.”

I could see plenty of situations where that might be applicable. For one, the enemy sometimes mix in with crowds of unarmed civilians - dispersing that crowd makes things a lot simpler.

Also, the suggestion that the device is used for “area denial” suggests another potentially valuable application in urban warfare - the denial of “dead space” like blind alleys and side streets to the enemy. Since that has traditionally been a role for artillery and other indirect fire weapons, this could fall under “reducing unnecessary casualties”.

This is mostly speculation on my part, but I have a hard time seeing Marines restraining themselves to using microwaves on enemies firing on them with AK-47s and RPGs.


62 posted on 07/18/2010 12:51:23 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: ottbmare

I should clarify that I’m not giving this thing my unqualified endorsement (for whatever that would be worth).

This isn’t a “battlefield innovation” of the kind Americans have always developed to adapt to the enemy and win wars. I don’t think it was purposefully developed in response to observed enemy tactics in Afghanistan - in fact, I’m pretty sure it was in development well before we ever contemplated invading Afghanistan.

Therefore, its use might be driven more by bureaucratic politics than by actual battlefield utility, much like a lot of other ill-conceived weapon systems. Still, if the Marines can find a good use for it, then I say give it a chance.

I should also say that my personal experience in modern urban warfare is limited to urban warfare training and doctrine in the 90s, and I assume those have changed as a result of our military’s experience over the last decade. I don’t have any personal experience concerning what our men are facing in Iraq and Afghanistan and what tactics they’re using. All I know about those wars is from what I’ve read and from veterans I’ve talked to.


65 posted on 07/18/2010 1:16:24 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson