Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joint Strike Fighter: Jet that's a 'spy in the sky'
BBC News ^ | 7/16/2010 | Jonathan Beale

Posted on 07/17/2010 6:51:52 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Development of the next generation of warplane is already over budget and behind schedule. Hidden in a hangar at the US Navy's Patuxent River Air Base, in Maryland, away from prying eyes and shaded from the intense sun, US and British ground crew made the final preparations before the plane took to the clear blue skies. RAF and Royal Navy personnel are already working alongside American crews as they conduct the final trials before it goes into production. There's nothing particularly unusual about the Lockheed Martin JSF's appearance. It looks like a modern jet fighter. It's what you can't see that makes it so special - its software and intelligence-gathering capabilities. Squadron leader Steve Long is the first RAF pilot to fly the single-seat plane. He says he can't believe his luck. He's like an enthusiastic boy who's just been given a very expensive toy. Sitting in the sleek cockpit he explains the plane's uniqueness. He says the obvious advantage of the aircraft is its stealth - or low visibility. It's like a well known brand of lager - it can reach parts of the world that others cannot. But there's much more. The JSF is also a spy in the sky. It can gather information from space, land and other aircraft - and then transmit that information to commanders on the ground.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; dfens; f35; jsf; naspatuxentriver; raf; royalnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 07/17/2010 6:51:55 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968; ...

Ping


2 posted on 07/17/2010 6:57:06 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

3 posted on 07/17/2010 7:20:00 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

I really like your pictures! Keep up the good work

:)


4 posted on 07/17/2010 7:20:46 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

“The US’s costs are greater because they are ordering three different versions of the plane - one for the US Airforce that can land and take off on a conventional runway, one for the US Navy that can be catapulted off their large aircraft carriers, and one for the US Marine Corps that - like the British version - will have a short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) capability.”

I’ve suspected that to be the case for some time. Trying to make one design meet three very different service requirements is a pricey business. It can be a risky one too, as it can lead to design compromises that make for a plane that doesn’t overwhelm in any particular role (though my gut feeling is they’ll get the F-35 done right, if not cheaply).


5 posted on 07/17/2010 7:24:04 PM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! SERPENTINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

I agree


6 posted on 07/17/2010 7:25:12 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

When it is all said and done, this fighter will do a lot of things well, but will not be best in class in any of it’s roles.


7 posted on 07/17/2010 7:29:10 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

It is impressive.It is a fifth generation, single-seat, single-engine stealth multirole fighter that can perform close air support, tactical bombing, and air defense missions.


8 posted on 07/17/2010 7:32:46 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Thank you

I wanted to post the video but could not figure out how to do that.

I tried to post the F35 but the size was either to large or to small. LOL

I love these beautiful airplanes!

9 posted on 07/17/2010 7:33:55 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

I encourage you to post more.


10 posted on 07/17/2010 7:36:01 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

11 posted on 07/17/2010 7:38:56 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBt-aQ1vObM


12 posted on 07/17/2010 7:47:33 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

Have to disagree with that.
This thing is top of the line.
It is the most advanced fighter in the world hands down.
The beauty of it..is its recon and undetected modes.
That means more than having firepower these days so far
as a military craft goes. Its all about spying, recon etc. Not alot of actual firing going on. We have the gunships and h/w for that.


13 posted on 07/17/2010 8:02:48 PM PDT by celtictomcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I like the F-35 and I always have liked it. It must be a totally amazing aircraft to get in and fly and I believe it has great performance potential.


14 posted on 07/17/2010 8:11:54 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: celtictomcat

Better than a F-22 Raptor ?


15 posted on 07/17/2010 9:13:57 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

But can we afford to build and field meaningful numbers? The thing people miss about Chinese and Indian economic growth is that scientific advance and military might will follow.


16 posted on 07/17/2010 9:25:19 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

I think we can. As more jets are built and sold, the cost of the jet will fall down.


17 posted on 07/17/2010 9:26:37 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

This is the “Hot Rod” of jets in the 21st century.


18 posted on 07/17/2010 9:28:32 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

F-22 has some advantages but overall F-35 has technical superiority in its h/w and s/w packaging.
I think the F-35 is cheaper also.
And that means alot when two items are comparable.


19 posted on 07/18/2010 5:04:07 PM PDT by celtictomcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: celtictomcat

I am just a general aviation driver and retired EOD so will trust your experience yet from my read(s) on such, including but not limited to that the USAFA has recently produced. I have to say I am a fence sitter on the pro versus con. I will make my bet on the F-22 in best of breed competition. Many good and bad on both sides but this was most honest I have found thus far.

http://www.afa.org/ProfessionalDevelopment/IssueBriefs/F-22_v_F-35_Comparison.pdf

Hope yer well Sir !


20 posted on 07/18/2010 6:33:50 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson