To: OneVike
There is no question in my mind that JD is by far the best candidate. I don't understand how the people of Arizona would re-elect someone who not only lies to them repeatedly, but also someone who has no qualms about attacking Republicans and conservatives ideas. He sounds like a conservative this election season because he is running for re-election. During yesterday's debate, McCain even said he was never for amnesty.
I was disappointed with Sarah as well, though I understand her reasoning for endorsing him.
To me, Jim Deakin appears to be a hitman - present in this race (and in the debates) just to damage JD and make sure that McCain wins. He kept attacking JD and generalizing with the stale observations that they are both bad, and they are both corrupt, etc. He seemed more interested in attacking JD rather than going after McCain. Deakin comes across as a precocious, smirking little imp - that effervescent 'smartest kid in the sixth grade' quality that most sane folks can't stand.
To: Victoria Delsoul
To me, Jim Deakin appears to be a hitman - present in this race (and in the debates) just to damage JD and make sure that McCain wins. He kept attacking JD and generalizing with the stale observations that they are both bad, and they are both corrupt, etc. He seemed more interested in attacking JD rather than going after McCain
That time out chair device he kept going to was pathetic. JD has every right to defend his record and remind Arizona of McCains, and he did it with class. I can't understand how any primary voter can waste their vote on Deakin, knowing this is exactly what Obama, Reid, Pelosi and the rest of the progressive cabal want.
To: Victoria Delsoul
My personal nickname for Deakin is the “little bulldog”. The little dog that’s always nipping at your heels and won’t let go of your pantleg.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson