Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
IMHO the US Attorney argued the wrong points.

The Stolen Valor law isn't about cheapening military awards and decorations. If they were most VFW and DAV halls would be empty.

They are about prevent fraud. Military service, particularly valorous service, rewards individuals with tangible results. The higher the award the more the rewards. Otherwise your liars would stop at being a discharged junior sergeant or junior officer.

Look at politicians of all strips that have lied about their service from a disabled Congressman who was disabled by his own weapons to people who have never served. Why?

The did it to fraudulently convince us that they were more qualified to hold office.

The article failed to mention what benefits the defendant had applied for based on his lies. That is was the US Attorney should have focused on - tangible fraud not an abstract concept. That would have made it much tougher for the Judge to issue his rulings.

46 posted on 07/16/2010 12:52:49 PM PDT by Nip (Islam - a religion of piece (your head and life). Truth depends on the spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nip

The appropriate punishment for this guy is public ridicule and shunning.


60 posted on 07/16/2010 3:03:06 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson