1 posted on
07/16/2010 9:45:26 AM PDT by
Palter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Palter
Oh, yeah. Great thinking Geert. As an expert in American politics it is the right thing to split the vote in a 2 party system. /sarc
Stupid Dutch. Language sounds like a fart in a bathtub anyway.
2 posted on
07/16/2010 9:48:28 AM PDT by
Mere Survival
(The time to fight was yesterday but now will have to do.)
To: Palter
3 posted on
07/16/2010 9:48:34 AM PDT by
mancini
To: Palter
Islamophobic I hate propaganda "journalists". Anyone who isn't "Islamophobic" is retarded.
4 posted on
07/16/2010 9:48:55 AM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Who allowed the worst oil pollution disaster in American history and did nothing?)
To: Palter
Reacting to Wilders yesterday, Ayhan Tonca, a well-known spokesman for Dutch Muslims, said he feared Wilders would meet with success as he spread his Islamophobic message. "So long as things are going badly with the economy, a lot of people always need a scapegoat," he said, calling on "well-meaning people in Europe to oppose this". How long until we hear Ayhan Tonca has sawed his wife's head off for looking at him wrong or some such thing?
5 posted on
07/16/2010 9:49:42 AM PDT by
xjcsa
(Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
To: Palter
“his Islamaphobic party”
Every time you don’t like something now, you are “-phobic.”
I guess it’s just not possible to oppose something. You have to be afraid of it.
6 posted on
07/16/2010 9:56:01 AM PDT by
Persevero
(Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
To: Palter
Now Wilders, who is under constant 24-hour protection because of his incendiary public statements on Islam Do Dutch words have some boomerang effect where if someone says them they can swing around and cause physical injury to the speaker? Or is the author too scared to say that Muslims don't like what he is saying and might kill Wilders too because of their hatred?
7 posted on
07/16/2010 9:58:58 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Gun control was originally to protect Klansmen from their victims. The basic reason hasn't changed.)
To: Palter
he is forming international alliances to launch branches of his Islamophobic party across the Western world. I don't see them refer to Islam as "freedom-phobic" or "civilization-phobic" but they should.
Opposing totalitarianism isn't a phobia. Its what you do if you love freedom and you aren't completely gutless.
8 posted on
07/16/2010 9:59:57 AM PDT by
marron
To: Palter
I’d like to see an honest and intellectually rigorous movement aimed at the destruction of Islam worldwide. Other religions can all peacefully coexist side by side, but Islam is not capable of this.
I’ve got no quarrel with most Muslims themselves, but they are shackled to a false and culturally cancerous faith that must be stopped. It’s us or them.
11 posted on
07/16/2010 10:03:21 AM PDT by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Palter
Might have some use in countries with systems that allocate representatives by the percentage of the vote. It will do little in the USA except to be a fly trap for federal law enforcement who view any perceived "radical" group to be a threat.
I'm sure that the tea party, minutemen and other organizations are riddled with LEOs. So much for true freedom of assembly.
To: Palter
Wilders accuses Islam of being violent and, coincidentally, apparently unrelated, has to be guarded 24 hours a day to keep him from being murdered by muslims.
Its his own fault for accusing them of being violent. Violence is not inherent in Islam; if you don’t oppose them they usually won’t murder you. Or in any case not that many of you.
13 posted on
07/16/2010 10:05:38 AM PDT by
marron
To: Palter
Sorry to go against the grain, but anti-Islamism will not be effective. The crusades have already been tried. They didn't work. Charles Martel fought the Islamics off in Tours, but they are now streaming into Paris. Jefferson sent the USMC to fight them on the shores of Tripoli, but they are building mosques at ground zero in New York.
I suggest something much more simple. Encourage people to commit their lives to Jesus Christ and then teach them witness to muslims. Make Islamics into disciples who also follow Jesus Christ, get them baptized and teach them to spread the good news. It works everytime it is tried.
14 posted on
07/16/2010 10:05:59 AM PDT by
Guyin4Os
(A messianic ger-tsedek)
To: Palter
He hasn’t hardly achieved anything in The Netherlands yet. Why doesn’t he focus there instead?
17 posted on
07/16/2010 10:16:12 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: Palter
...says he is forming international alliances to launch branches of his Islamophobic party across the Western world. Was American considered Naziphobic during WWII?
18 posted on
07/16/2010 10:16:27 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism and Patriotism cannot coexist.)
To: Palter
Geert is 100% right on about t he fascist part. Where do I sign up?
20 posted on
07/16/2010 10:22:56 AM PDT by
Candor7
(Obama .......yes.......is fascist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
To: Palter
"His rhetoric has led to him being charged under Dutch anti-hate laws - he will stand trial in October"
I thank God all the time for being in a country where I have the right of free speech and to keep and bear arms to protect all of my other rights he gave me.
To: Palter
Coming from a parlimentary system of government, I’m guessing he does not fully understand a republican form of government. If he did, he would realize that it is best to work within the existing party(s), more specifically the only sane one left than to start a new party.
To: Palter
The anti-Muslim politician Geert Wilders, whose Freedom party (PVV) won 24 seats and third place in the Dutch national election last month, says he is forming international alliances to launch branches of his Islamophobic party across the Western world.
“Islamophobic”... That’s not slanted... not a bit.
40 posted on
07/16/2010 11:16:43 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
To: Palter
I don’t support one issue parties but if he thinks it can work power to him. I’m getting a little tired of everything being described as a phobia when individuals oppose something. There is nothing irrational in opposition to radical Islam.
44 posted on
07/16/2010 11:43:21 AM PDT by
Maelstorm
(This country was not founded with the battle cry "give me liberty or give me a govt check!")
To: Palter
“Islamophobic”
Is that an aversion to being blown up or a fear of seeing an airplane coming at one on the 85th floor?
49 posted on
07/16/2010 12:41:28 PM PDT by
RoadTest
(Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
It is already global — it consists of everyone who is not a Moslem or leftist.
63 posted on
07/16/2010 5:29:49 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson