Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man at ATM fires back at would-be armed robber
http://charlotte.news14.com/content/local_news/charlotte/628167/man-at-atm-fires-back-at-would-be-armed-robber ^

Posted on 07/16/2010 5:00:47 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA

CHARLOTTE -- Police say a man shot a would-be robber Thursday night at an east Charlotte ATM.

According to police, the man was attempting to use a Cash Points ATM on Eastway Drive at North Tryon Street around 11 p.m. A suspect seemingly saw that as an opportunity and tried to rob the victim at gunpoint.

However, that victim was also armed. He shot the suspect twice in the leg. Police officials report that suspect suffered non-life-threatening injuries.

CMPD officials are no longer interviewing the shooter in the case, who they say did cooperate with detectives in their investigation. No charges are pending against him.

The suspected robber will face charges once that person is released from the hospital.

(Excerpt) Read more at charlotte.news14.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: elcid1970

LMAO


21 posted on 07/16/2010 5:51:13 AM PDT by Howie66 (I can see November from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Using an ATM in that area at night is like hanging out a sign saying, “ROB ME!”

I never use a walk up in Charlotte anymore (unless someone in the car has a piece in their hand) and never use a drive up ATM at night (or a convenience store for that matter).


22 posted on 07/16/2010 5:54:53 AM PDT by Big_Harry ( Starve the Beast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

Low hits could be the result of stress causing him just to point the gun and yank the trigger.

Or he was aiming at the scrot. :)


23 posted on 07/16/2010 5:58:04 AM PDT by IGOTMINE (1911s FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Two leg shots! He’s lucky the criminal didn’t return fire. Aim higher next time.


24 posted on 07/16/2010 5:59:46 AM PDT by crosshairs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Having stopped the threat, not everybody has the makeup to then take the kill shot.

Ummm...if you've stopped the threat, there is no legal reason to take the kill shot.

25 posted on 07/16/2010 6:12:58 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

A heavy fine for missing the perp? You are kidding. I was thinking more like a couple of hours on the police range and some beer afterwards.


26 posted on 07/16/2010 6:24:30 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
Ummm...if you've stopped the threat, there is no legal reason to take the kill shot.

If the perp is still armed there is still a threat. If I sat on the jury and the perp was still breathing I'd consider there to still be a threat.

27 posted on 07/16/2010 6:25:55 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
Dead perps tell no lies, either, but IIRC their family members can sue for “wrongful death” while wailing,

“He was just turning his life around!”

You forgot grandma "Johnny's a good boy, he'd never do that"

(even though Johnny has a rap sheet as long as his arm.)

28 posted on 07/16/2010 6:28:32 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All

The good citizen should sue the robber for causing emotional distress...


29 posted on 07/16/2010 6:40:34 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
Ummm...if you've stopped the threat, there is no legal reason to take the kill shot.

You're right. Shoot to stop, not shoot to kill.

If I ever had to shoot someone, I'd hope they lived. I don't want the death of another human being on my mind for the rest of my life, even if they 100% deserved it.

By forcing me to kill them, they'll have taken something from me. I'd do it if necessary, but wouldn't like having to live with it.
30 posted on 07/16/2010 6:55:05 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

I was thinking of it as an incentive to improve accuracy


31 posted on 07/16/2010 7:06:42 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop...........Eagle Scout since Sept 9, 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: John O
If the perp is still armed there is still a threat. If I sat on the jury and the perp was still breathing I'd consider there to still be a threat.

Reread the original comment....

Having stopped the threat, not everybody has the makeup to then take the kill shot.

32 posted on 07/16/2010 8:00:15 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeWarrior
You're right. Shoot to stop, not shoot to kill. If I ever had to shoot someone, I'd hope they lived. I don't want the death of another human being on my mind for the rest of my life, even if they 100% deserved it. By forcing me to kill them, they'll have taken something from me. I'd do it if necessary, but wouldn't like having to live with it.

Some people just don't realize that when you are physically attacked, you are dealing with two battles, the perp and the legal system. I want to survive both.

33 posted on 07/16/2010 8:03:07 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

It’s much easier to be heroic typing on a computer in the office than it is to intentionally take the life of a human being, even a rotten human being.


34 posted on 07/16/2010 8:07:41 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Indeed. One of the most difficult things in this life is to keep your composure while a gun is pointed at you. But sounds like some here have mastered that/sarc


35 posted on 07/16/2010 8:52:53 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

Yes, but only a mind reader would be aware of your perceptions regarding the threat at that point.


36 posted on 07/16/2010 9:41:51 AM PDT by G Larry (Democrats: expediting the Destruction of America, before they lose power...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Yes, but only a mind reader would be aware of your perceptions regarding the threat at that point.

Your perceptions still have to be reasonable and based on facts. I could perceive that the guy walking down the sidewalk in my direction is going to kill me. That perception doesn't give me the right kill him.

37 posted on 07/16/2010 10:13:27 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

Sorry to disagree with you, but sometimes their surviving family members can sue you.

A double tap aimed at the center of mass would reduce the likelihood that of any lawsuit, but the possibility is still there.

That’s always the biggest target, but you intent is never to have the perp go tango uniform – that’s the story you stick to.

On the other hand maybe he just wanted to kneecap the wandering shred of human debris.


38 posted on 07/16/2010 12:00:16 PM PDT by BerserkPatriot (There are no 1st Amendment rights without 2nd Amendment Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
me->If the perp is still armed there is still a threat. If I sat on the jury and the perp was still breathing I'd consider there to still be a threat.

you->Reread the original comment....

Having stopped the threat, not everybody has the makeup to then take the kill shot.

Let me be blatantly clear. If the perp is still breathing, you have not stopped the threat. If he is still armed (you know he had one gun, You don't know if he was carrying another) you have not stopped the threat. If there is any chance of future retaliation, you have not stopped the threat.

If I were sitting on the jury in any case where a person shot and killed a 'person' who had assaulted (attacked, tried to rob, etc) them, I would find the person not guilty due to self defense.

See what I am saying?

39 posted on 07/16/2010 12:04:39 PM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc

Yes, I’m sure they would say that maybe the victim should have given over the money and they could have both sung Kumbaya or something.

Violence only breeds violence... blah.. blah.. blah...

On a serious note – I think that this incident should highlight to all of us the importance of being vigilant, especially in a situation like this.

If your doing something like getting money out of an ATM you need to continuously look around the area for any threats.

And you need to be listening for anyone that may be approaching.

At least if you see someone approaching you can at least put you hand on your weapon just in case.


40 posted on 07/16/2010 12:11:04 PM PDT by BerserkPatriot (There are no 1st Amendment rights without 2nd Amendment Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson