Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taitz v. MacDonald - Docketed with SCOTUS
supremecourt.gov ^ | 07/14/2010 | Taitz

Posted on 07/14/2010 5:33:30 PM PDT by rxsid

This is the docket number, No. 10A56, for appeal with Justice Thomas (Mac Donald was one of the commanding officers of Connie Rhodes, that is why the original case was called Rhodes v MacDonald et al)

APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz; rhodes; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: stockpirate
Thank God for Orly

Obama agrees wholeheartedly.

41 posted on 07/15/2010 6:03:29 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
It's depressing because it shows a complete inability of some people to get past their personal agendas and actually learn from the past.

Kind of like a birther lawyer getting a parking ticket when filing their fourteenth appeal and then the true believers here titter excitedly about how that should now give them standing.

Or someone going on and on about how this issue never goes anywhere because the American system is completely corrupted, but somehow getting Obama out of office will make everything better.

42 posted on 07/16/2010 11:35:23 AM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
The problem is not that the American system is completely corrupted, it is that system requires an adversarial stance between the 2 political parties to be active over any issue for a real investigation.

Resolution 511 proves that adversarial relationship is deactivated over the Obama eligibility issue.

Orly's continued resistance is important not because it will remove Obama, that would require 5 out 9 SCOTUS votes to follow a path that will lead to serious political consequences, but because she may expose this danger to the republic as a side effect if SCOTUS decides to over rule Land on appeal and indicate a new judge should handle a reactivated case.

Obama exposed is still dangerous, but I would much rather have him exposed while a loyal American like SecDef Gates is still at the helm.

On the standing issue, who knows, maybe the sanctions will fail to pass the sniff test for Justice Kennedy. If the appeal is successful there is much more chance of light being shone on some unsettling details e.g. If Obama’s SSI has the Connecticut SSN on it - that along with other document irregularities would indicate its a fake. At the very least we would have a watergate-type cover up going on.

43 posted on 07/16/2010 12:56:24 PM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
The questuiuoin is whether the conservatives on the court want toplay politics right back to Obama, who has highly politicized many of their recent decisions. Hard to say. I hope they play.

Orly doesn't realize it, but the question of Obama's eligibility is not one she can even raise in this Petition. Her client dropped the case (and fired Orly as her lawyer). The only issue Orly can appeal is the sanctions award against her, and she was not sanctioned for bringing the eligibility suit-- she was sanctioned only for falsely accusing the judge of misconduct in her motion for reargument (she accused the judge of secretly meeting with Eric Holder, on a day when Holder was in Los Angeles and the judge was in Georgia).

The only issue the Supreme Court would have jurisdiction to rule on, if they did grant certiorari, is whether Orly's accusations against the judge are sanctionable. They clearly are, so the Court is no way going to hear this case.

44 posted on 07/16/2010 1:07:47 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Will the court hear it?

No.

45 posted on 07/16/2010 1:11:59 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
You birthers have faced nothing but defeat, after defeat, after defeat in the courts, and yet every time Taiz or some other incompetent lawyer on your side files another suit or appeal, you get your hopes up.

Why is it you people have such difficulty learning from experience?

46 posted on 07/16/2010 1:13:52 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Give thanks that "That Clown" Orly is keeping it alive.

I suppose I should be thankful for the entertainment and comic relief she provides.

47 posted on 07/16/2010 1:15:07 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The questions insult the inteligence of the court.
Cert denied without comment.


48 posted on 07/16/2010 1:17:24 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
We have a betting pool.But you are two days too late to join it.

Maybe next time.

49 posted on 07/16/2010 1:19:55 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is facist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
So where are the odds settling at?
50 posted on 07/16/2010 1:28:53 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Probably because folks hope some of the Justices on SCOTUS might remember their oaths to defend the constitution from all enemies both foreign and domestic.

At some point they will guess themselves what Obama is and what he intends to do, and indeed their own eventual fate under the “new order.”

Just pray they find a legal technicality to help Orly and trip up the budding dictator.

51 posted on 07/16/2010 1:39:46 PM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Too late.


52 posted on 07/16/2010 1:46:26 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is facist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
LOL. I love how you guys like to lecture a man with two law degress.
53 posted on 07/16/2010 1:48:45 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes.......is facist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK

Although I see you “converse” with the gang fairly regularly...a FReindly note of suggestion...don’t give the Obots the Kool-Aid they desire. Their only intention on the eligibility threads is to attempt to dissuade, discredit or otherwise libel the non Obots.


54 posted on 07/16/2010 1:58:54 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

I take your point. But I find it ironic that the very legal system the American Lawyers Guild uses so skillfully is the one that will be switched off when their ultimate political fantasy system is born as the US republic dies out.

As for going too far, which I think you hint at, what other label can you apply to a man who describes the freedoms granted to the people of the US by the constitution as “Negative Liberties?”


55 posted on 07/16/2010 2:15:47 PM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
I believe it was Doc Savage who said...

"Liberalism is a mental disorder."

It truly is astounding.

56 posted on 07/16/2010 2:41:32 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK

Excellent points —


57 posted on 07/17/2010 7:54:23 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

No. 10A56
Title:
Orly Taitz, Applicant
v.
Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel Garrison Commander, Fort Benning, et al.

Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-15418)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jul 8 2010 Application (10A56) for a stay, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Jul 15 2010 Application (10A56) denied by Justice Thomas.


58 posted on 07/17/2010 3:06:39 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

No surprise there.


59 posted on 07/17/2010 3:50:30 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
So let's see.

Either Taitz is incompetent, can't behave like a lawyer, and is in so far over her head she doesn't even know which end is up...

or

JUSTICE THOMAS IS AN OBOT!!! A TRAITOR TO THE CONSTITUTION!!!

I guess it wasn't very possible after all that the Supreme Court would take this up to relieve Taitz of her well-earned sanctions, a point we naive people with actual training in the law did make.

60 posted on 07/17/2010 4:16:31 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson