[ezfindit]

Suicidal and Insane! Obama must be stopped from continuing this destruction of our defenses.

[Habibi]

So the relevant question is, “Are we short on nukes?”.

It really doesn’t need to be more complex than that. If we’re long, we disassemble them. If we need more, we build ‘em up. You don’t just leave these things lying around, if you don’t have a need for the number in inventory.

Have what you need. All else is quite expensive, and useless if they can’t be fielded/used.

[The Comedian]

President-for-Life Barry is planning to personally oversee this suicide until 2021, I see.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[musicman]

"Obama To Eliminate 40 Percent of US Nuclear Weapons"

[dadgum]

Dear Mr Barack Hussein Obama, Please lead by example and cut your personal security detail by half.

If it’s good enough for us little folk, it’s good enough for you.

[ronnie raygun]

Can we all say TREASON! FOR GOD SAKE

[LibLieSlayer]

President Palin... stroke of the pen... law of the land... this will never be put into place.

LLS

[JimSEA]

40% is just a beginning, that is if we last that long. Suicide.

[Doomonyou]

Hell, why don’t you just pack them up and ship them to Iran?

[bert]

OK, let’s insert some rational thought into the mix.

What percentage of the weapons are delivered by systems either obsolete or no longer in existence?

What percentage can be delivered by systems under design?

What percentage are suffering from age and reliability?

What percentage were designed and built to strike targets that are no longer targets?

What is the cost effectiveness of maintaining weapons that have a less than 10 or even 20 % probability of being used or are near obsolete back up for more recent or improved designs?

On and on and on.