Skip to comments.
Democrats and AARP want to make IRA enrollment automatic
The Hill ^
| July 12, 2010
| Walter Alarkon
Posted on 07/13/2010 6:09:05 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
AARP in bed with the democrats to find more ways to steal money. You can bet the government will skim their share off somewhere.
To: Second Amendment First
yup and we dont stand a chance against them ...the party of NO doesnt know the meaning of the word...
2
posted on
07/13/2010 6:11:18 AM PDT
by
dalebert
To: Second Amendment First
3
posted on
07/13/2010 6:11:44 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
To: Second Amendment First
4
posted on
07/13/2010 6:12:01 AM PDT
by
Doogle
(IT'S THAT TIME AGAIN....PLEASE donate, because it's the RIGHT thing to do)
To: Second Amendment First
Lemme guess... the money would go directly into accounts at an AARP-owned bank, right? Nothing could POSSIBLY GO WRONG with that!
Of course, the left conveniently misses the easiest way to encourage savings. QUIT TAXING INCOME!
5
posted on
07/13/2010 6:13:36 AM PDT
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Second Amendment First
The Obama administration sees the auto-enrollment system as a way to increase savings. Obama and the AARP actually see this as a new source of funds that will be seized, as will all existing 401K and IRA funds in the near future under the guise of Guaranteed Retirement Accounts (just more cash for the government to amass more power.)
6
posted on
07/13/2010 6:13:38 AM PDT
by
Washi
To: Second Amendment First
My Tax adviser, for the first time,
is recommending converting IRA’s / 401K’s to Roths
in expectation of higher incremental tax rates
beginning next year.
To: Second Amendment First
I “opted out” of AARP in the early ‘90s when they were pushing “Hillary care.” I’ve never regretted my departure from that malignant organization.
8
posted on
07/13/2010 6:14:50 AM PDT
by
davisfh
To: Second Amendment First
If the AARP is for it, I am against it.
9
posted on
07/13/2010 6:15:18 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
To: Second Amendment First
Irish Republican Army?
What they supposed to do, blow themselves up???
10
posted on
07/13/2010 6:15:57 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
To: Washi
Obama and the AARP actually see this as a new source of funds that will be seized, as will all existing 401K and IRA funds in the near future under the guise of Guaranteed Retirement Accounts (just more cash for the government to amass more power. All true.
11
posted on
07/13/2010 6:17:31 AM PDT
by
ILS21R
(A 200 year supply of oil... in Alaska....right now)
To: Second Amendment First
"The Obama administration sees the auto-enrollment system as a way to increase STEAL your savings. "
So long as citizens pay their law-required taxes, their private income and money/savings are no business of the Government...OR the marxist AARP.
The AARP offers little hotel and insurance "discounts" in exchange for helping their democrat pals steal you blind on the other end.
If you're a member, resign...if not, don't join. They are an arm of the obama regime out to take your money in exchange for a few paltry discounts here and there. You can save more money clipping coupons.
12
posted on
07/13/2010 6:17:51 AM PDT
by
FrankR
( If we don't stand up to tyranny, the tyrants win, and we're enslaved.)
To: Doogle
Stop, just stop, enough, really I’m not sure anymore I want to live in a country where we have our hand held from cradle to grave and are taxed to death at a young age.
These*&^%$r’s khow how to suck the fun and the life out of everything.
13
posted on
07/13/2010 6:19:30 AM PDT
by
VTenigma
To: Diogenesis
Perfect image. It goes back in every postage paid envelope from AARP and affiliates.
14
posted on
07/13/2010 6:19:47 AM PDT
by
Second Amendment First
("Stripping motivated people of their dignity and rubbing their noses in it is a very bad idea.")
To: Second Amendment First
People are too stupid to know how to save money.
The government has to do it for them. So they can steal it and spend it.
15
posted on
07/13/2010 6:20:06 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: Second Amendment First
Let me guess...this needs to happen ..so government can claim more regulatory oversight of IRA’s..once they are “government mandated” ...basically an mechanism of snooping and controlling.
16
posted on
07/13/2010 6:21:40 AM PDT
by
mo
To: Second Amendment First
AARP in bed with the democrats to find more ways to steal money. You can bet the government will skim their share off somewhere. SAF...
They want to supplant 401(k)'s etc with what they are calling if my memory s correct a GPA i.e. Gov' t Preferred Annuity or some such rubbish. Esentially a sister program to Social Security with a guaranteed rate of return of 3% (rule of 72's means it would take 24 years to double {epic fail}) and they get if 50% when you die.
Yes this give them a bigger pool for when they "nudge" us into this scheme.....
17
posted on
07/13/2010 6:24:15 AM PDT
by
taildragger
((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: Second Amendment First
I have to wonder...
Aren't the Dimocrats the same party that is looking at nationalizing all existing IRA accounts? There has been a year long thread about proposals, which haven't gone anywhere (yet), along that line.
Now they want everyone to have a mandatory IRA?
What has happened, in Argentina, where these two trends merged?
Remember, a century ago Argentina was one of the wealthiest nations in the world. Then came the Peron’s (sp?) and their socialist programs. Look where Argentina is today.
Who says there is no proof of our worries?
18
posted on
07/13/2010 6:24:38 AM PDT
by
Nip
(Islam - a religion of piece (your head and life). Truth depends on the spelling)
To: Second Amendment First
Ruh Roh
anything the govt makes “mandatory” the govt will claim a stake in.... perhaps having these “mandatory” IRA’s managed by “minority” run investment firms- Franklin Raines anyone?
19
posted on
07/13/2010 6:25:29 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
To: Nip
Who says there is no proof of our worries? Hey, but we may get farther in the World Cup. /s
20
posted on
07/13/2010 6:28:43 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson