“A man was killed because he was destroying merchandise.”
I will wait to see the video of the destruction before I consider that a fact. So far, we only have a clerk’s word that destruction of merchandise was taking place.
“So far, we only have a clerk’s word”
Well, somewhere I read another witness account who said the man was behaving normally in the store. Seems possible that the store employee who reported the destructive behavior may have just been trying to get the CCW guy in trouble after noticing he was carrying. That would be typical Lib style! The vids should tell the story, and if he was acting normally, the employee should be charged as an accomplice to murder! We’ll just have to wait and see/
I’d be willing to bet a buck that
“destruction of merchandise” = opening a box to check the contents.
This sounds like typical cops shoot first, cover up later.