[DarthVader]

RINO Inglis has been sterilized with extreme prejudice.

[Interesting Times]

A nice, solid article.

American Pravda and its ilk have been lying for a long time. Now, fortunately, we have sources of information other than the old media. That is a situation that must be preserved at all costs.

[Jim Robinson]

Woo hoo!! The Tea Party Rebellion term limits squad bags another raging RINO!!

It’s open season on RINOs. No bag limit!!

Rebellion is brewing!!

[Mamzelle]

We should have a schadenfreude party.

Oh, my, how sour are the grapes, Bob!

[Mamzelle]

We should have a schadenfreude party.

Oh, my, how sour are the grapes, Bob!

[BuckyKat]

Now I’m really confused. The guy essentially put down what Sarah Palin said, made fun of her comments, but it’s HER fault he lost? Now if she’d endorsed him and he lost... then perhaps it might reflect just a little bit on her, but it sounds like he was the anti-Sarah Palin.

[freespirited]

Inglis spent how many years in DC? Yet he is unable to understand how legislation works.

Case in point, RATcare. Here's a paragraph from the legislation that he insists has no death panels:

INSUFFICIENT FUNDS.—If the Secretary estimates for any fiscal year that the aggregate amounts available for the payment of the expenses of the high risk pool will be less than the actual amount of such expenses, the Secretary shall make such adjustments as are necessary to eliminate such deficit.

A freshman member of Congress should understand that this language confers upon the Secretary of Health and Human Services the power to ration care as necessary to stay on budget. That a long-serving member of Congress doesn't get this is absolutely positively pathetic.

As a matter of fact, I am near certain a previous draft of the bill used more explicit language that included phrases like the Secretary may "reduce benefits" and "establish waiting lists." Apparently that language was taken out because it supported Sarah's claims.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Poor Bob. He lost the seat to which he had a divine right because he wouldn’t join in the horrible demagoguery practiced by Sarah Palin, and now that his career as a congressman-for-life has been cut tragically short, the AP must run to him for an explanation of all that has gone wrong in American politics [...] Bob Inglis lost because his constituents know more about ObamaCare than he does, and because he doesn’t have the intestinal fortitude to do what’s necessary to fix this country’s problems. People who do – people like Sarah Palin and those she supports – are getting the chance in more and more places because people are beginning to understand the consequences of continuing to elect slugs like Bob Inglis.

Dan Calabrese "gets" it. ;)

[MontaniSemperLiberi]

His loss had nothing to do with Palin or Beck.

1. He voted with the Democrats against the surge in Iraq.

2. He voted for TARP.

3. He was for Cap and Trade.

4. He voted to censure Joe Wilson.

[patriot preacher]

Buh-bye Bobby. And, don’t go away mad — just, GO AWAY.