Disagree; vigorously.
This ruling is constitutional and retards the agenda of the left (federalization).
If Massachusetts wants to dignify homosexual behavior, let them. All politics are local. If you disagree, move out of Massachusetts or stay and work to correct the tragedy.
“This ruling is constitutional and retards the agenda of the left (federalization).
If Massachusetts wants to dignify homosexual behavior, let them. All politics are local. If you disagree, move out of Massachusetts or stay and work to correct the tragedy”
I do tend to agree that this is a question for the states to decide individually. One sticking point however is this: Most states recognize the marriages in another state.
If someone moves from a state that recognizes homosexual “marriage” to one that doesn’t, then what happens?
Does the state have to recognize that marriage? If they do not, is that a violation of the equal protection clause?