Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sourcery

The government not only can, but must decide the requirements necessary to receive Medicare benefits. It must also define the terms used in the laws. Whenever “marriage” appears in fed law, it refers to man/woman.

From DOMA: “In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.”

It is preposterous to let judges define the terms used in federal law. It violates the very separation of powers defined in our Constitution to acquiesce.


48 posted on 07/08/2010 4:41:37 PM PDT by Jacquerie (We live in a judicial tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie
Medicare is Unconstitutional, so that eliminates that issue. I challenge to find any Constitutional law where Congress has any Constitutional justification for using words such as "marriage" or "married" in the text of the law.
50 posted on 07/08/2010 4:44:31 PM PDT by sourcery (Government should be as powerless as possible, while still able to protect individual rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson