Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene

Then they lose on that, too, since the 287(g) already authorizes state and local LEOs to determine who is or is not in the country legally.


54 posted on 07/06/2010 6:19:32 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants
Then they lose on that, too, since the 287(g) already authorizes state and local LEOs to determine who is or is not in the country legally.

Not sure what 287(g) is?? From what I'm reading, so far, the suit is saying that it is not legal to "criminally sanction" a person who is unlawfully present in a state (illegal alien) since it is not a federal crime. The JD is trying to say they have the right to allow certain people, whether they entered illegally or not, to stay or be deported based on their determination of their value, need, dangerousness, what-not.

I had no idea it is not a crime to be here "unlawfully". It IS a crime to enter illegally - I guess they have to catch you in the act. Otherwise, from the legal mumbo-jumbo I'm reading, the fed's can do what they want with you, regardless of what the states decide, once you've arrived.
59 posted on 07/06/2010 6:32:56 PM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson