Usually I skim over any set of bible verses you post because they have no meaning in your hands and it feels sort of dirty, having a non-Christian use my scripture to prove to me that my scripture is unsufficient and innacurate.
Twistianity, as shawn McCrany says.
But one verse caught my eye against my will. What in the name of macaroni and cheese does 1 Sam. 1:13 have to do with Joseph Smith "knowng" that Presbyterianism was untrue?
Now Hannah, she spake in her heart; only her lips moved, but her voice was not heard: therefore Eli thought she had been drunken.
Probably because JS was also a drunk. That’s the only connection I can see.
I always find if fascinating when LDSers say some document, statement or charge was answered and as proof that the issue(s) in question was answered successfully point to LDS sources. How about an acknowledgment from the person making the charge or asking the question. You can ask me if 2+2=4 and I can say no, you are wrong, your sources are inaccurate. You can then press the question and I can say I answered you already, the debate is closed. Of course I would still be wrong, but as far as I was concerned the question was answered and I can tell all those listening I answered you. |