Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
Wrong. I'm asking them to review Obama's eligibility. If he turns out to be ineligible, they aren't overturning the election, but upholding the Constitution.

The time for the courts to review Obama's eligibility would have been before the election.

Now that he is POTUS, "upholding the Constitution" means impeachment.

147 posted on 07/04/2010 10:40:07 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: Tex-Con-Man

I don’t have a problem with impeachment. Obama has most likely committed criminal fraud over his eligibiity. A court finding would help expedite the matter.


148 posted on 07/04/2010 11:15:37 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Now that he is POTUS upholding the 20th Amendment of the Constitution means the courts should declare that Joe Biden should have the presidential powers and Congress should be deciding what to do with Obama, who is a president with the Constitutional “inability to discharge the powers and duties of the” presidency.


160 posted on 07/18/2010 6:07:29 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: Tex-Con-Man
Now that he is POTUS, "upholding the Constitution" means impeachment.

That's just it...

Impeachment is for sitting presidents, and if one is not legitimately a president, there can be no impeachment.

163 posted on 07/18/2010 7:15:36 AM PDT by MamaTexan (Dear GOP - "We Suck Less" is ~NOT~ a campaign platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson