Some of that is libertarian and some of it isn’t. I think the artist is a bit confused.
what a load of crap
I’m a libertarian and I think that is hilarious.
lol
He left off the “I’m a Libertarian-Constitutionalist who wants federal judges to strike down any laws I don’t like.”
I guess I'm that guy, cause I was just thinking yesterday (during an argument in my head with a libtard), that the 2nd Amendment gives a person the right to not own a gun and rely on someone else for safety.
LOL, They need the Ron Paulian. All they say is Ron Paul over and over and over and have a little shrine with rEVOLution written in their typical format.
A lot of those really fit. I wish we could tag people on pics.
I agree with a lot of libertarianism, but some libertarians I can't stomach like Lew Rockwell.
I think it's pretty good to be able to laugh at yourself and I can recognize myself (or my friends) in a lot of those digs.
The "Too Smart For Science" guy, however, is a real off-the-wall note. What does believing in global warming have to do with a political viewpoint. You can be a big gub guy and doubt global warming. You can be a libertarian and believe it to be absolutely true.
I figure that most doubters of global warming aren't motivated by an ideology just by experience that if someone lies to you once, they are going to lie to you again.
The author’s views can be summed up by his upper right-most caption. He can criticize libertarians all he wants, but he might have trouble criticizing libertarianism.
The artist is a Climategate Denier.
Signs onboard for the welfare state and federalism too.
He rejects the notion that gas taxes pay for roads and echo’s Obama’s meme about some old person complaining against Obamacare while saying “don’t touch my medicare”.
I am a big critic of Libertarians, but most of those are rather unfair...except maybe the “Stoned” one. :-)
Even the whole rest of the world sees that we have passed a Socialized Medicine bill. It’s not just Republicans and Libertarians who are willing to point this out.
If Socialism isn’t so bad, why can’t any of them step up to the bar and admit it?
It isn’t “socialist” enough by their definition?
At what point would it be “not socialist at all”?
Uh oh.
(finger) to Barry Ritholtz who is a garden variety democrap. He has no problem laying the housing mess on Bush’s doorstep when it was Clinton’s actions on CRA and his signatures on Graham Leach Bliley and the Commodities Modernization Acts that set the mess in motion.
The Missionary seemed right on, but the rest was suspect.
The One Type of Leftist
Gimme s**t and don’t expect me to contribute to society.