Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigReb555

Yet today, the Confederacy is demonized entirely. I even see a lot of FReepers (who should certainly know better) insisting that this war was fought over slavery.

Pisses me off to no end. It cheapens the sacrifice of many, many thousands (extended to those at home, millions).


2 posted on 06/30/2010 3:53:41 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RightOnline

That’s what the schools teach. Or did when I was in school 20 years ago. It was after I was out of school that I read on the Civil War and sided with the Confederates.


3 posted on 06/30/2010 3:55:47 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightOnline

It was fought over slavery.


9 posted on 06/30/2010 4:07:21 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightOnline

I’ve got Yankee friends who are starting to catch on. The other day one sent me Lincoln’s famous wartime “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it” letter to New York newspaperman Horace Greeley:

Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.

Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.

I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I “seem to be pursuing” as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be “the Union as it was.” If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.

Yours,
A. Lincoln.


16 posted on 06/30/2010 4:33:41 PM PDT by Bill W was a conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RightOnline
The Civil War was fought over slavery. That said, I agree the present day demonization of that chapter of the South's history is wrong. If those veterans of that great and bloody battle could set aside their differences and shake hands as Americans, it seems to me the allegedly mature adults of our era could do so too.
18 posted on 06/30/2010 4:39:21 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson