Skip to comments.
Judge rules against first-degree Mehserle verdict {BART Shooting}
Oakland Tribune ^
| 6/30/10
| Paul T. Rosynsky
Posted on 06/30/2010 2:29:52 PM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: benewton
Theres a reason effective weapons arent allowed to be owned by citizens in CA...
Because the cops and politicians have every reason to be scared? Probably so.
Meanwhile we in CA can own any weapons we want. The Constitution takes priority over any illegal local ordinances.
21
posted on
06/30/2010 6:13:55 PM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: DCBryan1
I was wrong.
I'm sure you're used to it by now. Most rational people would be pretty embarrassed to admit that they support this murderer, but you just go right on.
22
posted on
06/30/2010 6:15:55 PM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: Filo
He's not a murderer in our country until proven so. I never said I supported him. All I pointed out that
legally he had no intent on premeditated murder.
All one has to do is look at one page of your posting history to find out what you really are.
I thought that you were only an, ignorant, blowhard, petulant child, but worse, you a BIGOT, and the worst kind.
23
posted on
06/30/2010 7:29:51 PM PDT
by
DCBryan1
(FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists".)
To: DCBryan1
He's not a murderer in our country until proven so.
Agreed. And at least you were wise enough to refrain from saying "in a court of law." OJ is still a murderer regardless of the result of the trial. Same with this moron. The video evidence covers that whether or not the jury is bamboozled by the badge and related nonsense.
I never said I supported him.
You didn't have to.
All I pointed out that legally he had no intent on premeditated murder.
And that you thought he should get off, etc.
Meanwhile, even the quoted statement above is wrong. He had his taser out (and shouldn't have since the victim was already under two jackboots and had cuffs on) then he decided to put it away, exchanging it for his gun. He then presented his weapon, aimed and fired at the back of a restrained man. That's murder 1, friend.
All one has to do is look at one page of your posting history to find out what you really are.
Brilliant and always correct. If I posted a picture you'd also see strikingly handsome.
I thought that you were only an, ignorant, blowhard, petulant child, but worse, you a BIGOT, and the worst kind.
And just how am I a bigot? Because I recognize that the police are almost all corrupt bastards who don't deserve to be in my employ?
All of the cops and bootlickers here prove my contention straight away by defending this dipweed and implying that his only mistake was not shooting the rest of the hooligans.
Look at it this way - if a "civilian" had done the same thing what would you say?
A handful of good samaritans break up a fight and detain the brawlers. Two of them take one of the guys, tie his hands behind his back and then sit on him. One of the others,a CCW holder, pulls out his weapon and shoots the restrained man in the back.
What do you say then?
Never mind answering. I know what you'll say already: "cops are different, doing a hard job, blah, blah, blah."
All nonsense, of course, but I'm sure you'll say it.
24
posted on
06/30/2010 7:48:54 PM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: Filo
“Oakland would have been better served giving guns to a troup of chimps.”
Oakland? Oscar Grant was from Hayward. He was killed by Bart Police riding Bart. It is mere chance that he was at an Oakland station at the time. If they had pulled him off the train two stops further down he’d have been in San Leandro. Four stops, in Hayward. Oakland cops and the City of Oakland have NOTHING to do with this.
But the rioting pukes need a gathering spot, so we’re it.
To: Flash Bazbeaux
Oakland? Oscar Grant was from Hayward. He was killed by Bart Police riding Bart. It is mere chance that he was at an Oakland station at the time. If they had pulled him off the train two stops further down hed have been in San Leandro. Four stops, in Hayward. Oakland cops and the City of Oakland have NOTHING to do with this.
Fair 'nuff. Substitute "BART" or "The Bay Area" or "California" or "The United States" for "Oakland" and we're still golden.
26
posted on
07/01/2010 6:06:41 AM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: DCBryan1
27
posted on
07/01/2010 1:34:30 PM PDT
by
Pigsley
To: DCBryan1
28
posted on
07/01/2010 1:34:39 PM PDT
by
Pigsley
To: Filo
Make sure you don’t call the cops when they break into yer Mam’s basement and take your penny jar.
29
posted on
07/01/2010 1:37:06 PM PDT
by
Pigsley
To: Pigsley
Make sure you dont call the cops when they break into yer Mams basement and take your penny jar.
I don't call the cops. Period.
They can't be trusted to not shoot indiscriminately (as Mehserle, amongst many others, proves) and they rarely solve crimes anyway.
30
posted on
07/01/2010 2:40:30 PM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: Filo
Good luck with not ever calling the cops. I've had very good experiences with cops. I do know they are human and there is an occasional bad apple.
Oh, here is a fun idea for you, since you live in the Bay Area...go down to the disgusting Bart Station that takes you to the airport and stand there for 5 minutes at a ticket machine and see how many scumbag, animals try to scam you, touch you physically, try to intimidate you or just grab your money. Now, make sure and be very nice while they are abusing you....don't get all p o’d if they call you all kinds of names if you don't want to hand that $20 over to them for the kind “help”. And if somebody clubs you over the head and steals your wallet, do make sure not to call an evil cop.
31
posted on
07/01/2010 3:36:31 PM PDT
by
Pigsley
To: Pigsley
Good luck with not ever calling the cops.
Thank you.
I've had very good experiences with cops.
As have I, once or twice.
I do know they are human and there is an occasional bad apple.
Sure. That's the 99% giving the 1% a bad name part.
Those in the 99% aren't all bad all of the time so you aren't always going to have a bad experience with them, but they are almost all right on the verge of being just like Mehserle or the clowns who beat Rodney King or the idiots who billy-clubed an unconscious driver thrown from his car or the dimwits who pulled a quadriplegic from his wheelchair and tossed him over a wall to pat him down or the nimrod who pulled over a motorcyclist and shot him in the back 1.2 seconds after exiting his patrol car (at least he's doing time) or the a-hole who murdered a young mother in front of her family for holding a vegetable peeler or the dirt bags who shot Amadou Diallo 100+ times for showing his ID (or trying to) or the worthless 'tards who tasered a grandma in her wheelchair or the hundreds of imbeciles who have shot dogs for no reason and so on.
Oh, here is a fun idea for you, since you live in the Bay Area...go down to the disgusting Bart Station that takes you to the airport and stand there for 5 minutes at a ticket machine and see how many scumbag, animals try to scam you, touch you physically, try to intimidate you or just grab your money. Now, make sure and be very nice while they are abusing you....don't get all p od if they call you all kinds of names if you don't want to hand that $20 over to them for the kind help. And if somebody clubs you over the head and steals your wallet, do make sure not to call an evil cop.
And, of course, any of those folks (aside from the one clubbing me over the head) deserve to be shot in the back while restrained for being who they are.
If I do it I go to jail.
If a cop does it then it's perfectly okay, right?
32
posted on
07/01/2010 3:55:15 PM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: Filo
Must make for some long days for you, and your employer, though I doubt it on the 2nd. Logic is yer friend, try to get over the crossing guard thing.
33
posted on
07/01/2010 5:16:54 PM PDT
by
Pigsley
To: Pigsley
Must make for some long days for you, and your employer, though I doubt it on the 2nd. Logic is yer friend, try to get over the crossing guard thing.
Did you want to try that again in English?
34
posted on
07/01/2010 6:48:59 PM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: ridesthemiles
Adding a using a gun enhancement against a police officer who is supposed to carry a gun is beyond ludicrous.
Why? Cops add the "using a gun enhancement" all the time to up the charges against civilians who didn't actually use a gun in the crime but legally owned one and had it in their house or car. What's good for the goose...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson