Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Filo
He's not a murderer in our country until proven so. I never said I supported him. All I pointed out that legally he had no intent on premeditated murder.

All one has to do is look at one page of your posting history to find out what you really are.

I thought that you were only an, ignorant, blowhard, petulant child, but worse, you a BIGOT, and the worst kind.

23 posted on 06/30/2010 7:29:51 PM PDT by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: DCBryan1
He's not a murderer in our country until proven so.

Agreed. And at least you were wise enough to refrain from saying "in a court of law." OJ is still a murderer regardless of the result of the trial. Same with this moron. The video evidence covers that whether or not the jury is bamboozled by the badge and related nonsense.

I never said I supported him.

You didn't have to.

All I pointed out that legally he had no intent on premeditated murder.

And that you thought he should get off, etc.

Meanwhile, even the quoted statement above is wrong. He had his taser out (and shouldn't have since the victim was already under two jackboots and had cuffs on) then he decided to put it away, exchanging it for his gun. He then presented his weapon, aimed and fired at the back of a restrained man. That's murder 1, friend.

All one has to do is look at one page of your posting history to find out what you really are.

Brilliant and always correct. If I posted a picture you'd also see strikingly handsome.

I thought that you were only an, ignorant, blowhard, petulant child, but worse, you a BIGOT, and the worst kind.

And just how am I a bigot? Because I recognize that the police are almost all corrupt bastards who don't deserve to be in my employ?

All of the cops and bootlickers here prove my contention straight away by defending this dipweed and implying that his only mistake was not shooting the rest of the hooligans.

Look at it this way - if a "civilian" had done the same thing what would you say?

A handful of good samaritans break up a fight and detain the brawlers. Two of them take one of the guys, tie his hands behind his back and then sit on him. One of the others,a CCW holder, pulls out his weapon and shoots the restrained man in the back.

What do you say then?

Never mind answering. I know what you'll say already: "cops are different, doing a hard job, blah, blah, blah."

All nonsense, of course, but I'm sure you'll say it.
24 posted on 06/30/2010 7:48:54 PM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson