To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Since the EPA is responsible for ecological health, then why haven’t these dispersants been tested already?
3 posted on
06/30/2010 1:11:06 PM PDT by
DallasDeb
(USAFA '06 Mom)
To: DallasDeb
I believe they were and this is just to show us that they’re doing something....AND PROBABLY BILLING BP some extraordinary amount.
9 posted on
06/30/2010 1:26:22 PM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(What)
To: DallasDeb
Did a tiny bit of research. Testing is submitted to EPA. And for ex. Corerit 9500 is on the USE Contingency Plan Schedule.
Guess it works like the FDA.
Other countries incl. England and Canada have approved the stuff
To: DallasDeb
Since the EPA is responsible for ecological health, then why havent these dispersants been tested already? I think they have been, but at less concentrated levels (as would apply in surface use, rather than sub-sea injection). At least, that's what I recall reading over at The Oil Drum.
15 posted on
06/30/2010 2:07:20 PM PDT by
Charles Martel
("Endeavor to persevere...")
To: DallasDeb
It was tested and approved years ago.
The concern is using it underwater and in such large quantities.
20 posted on
06/30/2010 6:39:00 PM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson