Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No-texting law begins Thursday (Georgia (State Of))
AlbanyHerald.com ^ | 06/30/2010 | Pete Skiba

Posted on 06/30/2010 6:10:57 AM PDT by devane617

ALBANY, Ga. — Spread the word, but don’t text it if you are driving. Two new distracted driver laws take effect in Georgia tomorrow. One law prohibits drivers from “using wireless telecommunications devices for writing, sending or receiving text messages while operating a motor vehicle,” according to the website drivinglaws.org.

The other prohibits a driver under 18 years old with a driver permit or a class D license from using a wireless communication device.

Breaking either law can result in arrest and a $150 fine with a point put on the license.

“This only applies to drivers on the road,” Albany Police Department Sgt. William Dowdell said. “If you pull over and park in a parking lot with your motor running it is OK.”

Neither the Albany Police Department nor the Dougherty County Police reported any fatalities due to texting while driving, officials said. There have been vehicle crashes with damages due to drivers’ texting. “This was before the law went into effect,” county police Ptl. Steve Graffam said. “But, just after an accident, drivers have admitted they were texting just before the accident.”

Police officers from both departments said that enforcement could be problematic because of the way the law is written.

Under the law, a driver can dial a number and talk on the phone, Dowdell said. It could be difficult for an officer to tell if a driver is dialing or texting, he added.

Graffam said that officers would be on the lookout for driving behavior that is associated with texting, such as swerving or slamming on brakes.

“A driver could be texting then look up and see he is too close to another vehicle, then slam on brakes,” Graffam said. “We have gotten good responses from cell companies when we subpoena them about texting times and records.”

With the evidence that a driver was texting just before a crash from the driver’s cell phone company, it would be easier to prove the charge than just by the officer’s observation, Graffam said.

The law and the penalties aren’t the point, officers said. The point is to keep the roads safe. Text messaging is banned for drivers in 28 states and the District of Columbia.

“Safety is our main priority,” Graffam said. “That is our priority for all drivers. We will enforce the law to its full extent.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: cell; cellphone; texting; txt
Wonder how it affects me, as a Texan, when I visit the state?
1 posted on 06/30/2010 6:11:01 AM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: devane617

I wish they had taken it further to require “hands-free” headsets while driving.

I’m sick of having to swerve around the dumba$$ in the left lane on the interstate going 50 mph, occasionally wandering across the line, phone stuck in the ear, oblivious to the line of traffic backed up behind him! I see it every freaking day!


2 posted on 06/30/2010 6:17:56 AM PDT by a real Sheila (REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

3 posted on 06/30/2010 6:19:50 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617
Graffam said that officers would be on the lookout for driving behavior that is associated with texting

Wait - isn't that profiling?

RACISTS!

4 posted on 06/30/2010 6:22:39 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

Saw that on a bumper sticker. Perfect!!!


5 posted on 06/30/2010 6:47:15 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: a real Sheila
I’m sick of having to swerve around the dumba$$ in the left lane on the interstate going 50 mph, occasionally wandering across the line, phone stuck in the ear, oblivious to the line of traffic backed up behind him! I see it every freaking day!

Bingo, Bingo, Bingo,

6 posted on 06/30/2010 6:49:18 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: devane617

“Wonder how it affects me, as a Texan, when I visit the state?:

If you are in Georgia after today, don’t text while driving or you will be risking a big fine.


7 posted on 06/30/2010 6:51:34 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617
“Safety is our main priority,” Graffam said. “That is our priority for all drivers. We will enforce the law to its full extent.”

The usual lot of bluster and misdirection.

It's about CASH just as seatbelt laws, the ongoing redefinition of DUI, and so-called 'safety' checkpoints are.

It would take Superman's x-ray vision to peer into cars moving 70 mph in the opposite direction on the Interstate for an officer to have any clue as to the driver's activities.

Hyper-specific laws such as this one are shiny new toys for the government and the gullible who follow the 'Do Something!' mantra. Unsafe operation is already against the law and a driver suspected of texting could merely say he was using his GPS or iPod.

8 posted on 06/30/2010 6:55:31 AM PDT by relictele (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

I think the penalty for getting caught texting ought to be the same as the penalty for drunk driving.


9 posted on 06/30/2010 7:02:26 AM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele

“Hyper-specific laws such as this one are shiny new toys for the government and the gullible who follow the ‘Do Something!’ mantra. Unsafe operation is already against the law and a driver suspected of texting could merely say he was using his GPS or iPod. “

The phone company could easily provide a record of texting activity.


10 posted on 06/30/2010 7:03:32 AM PDT by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

Not if the user is ‘texting’ using Facebook or any other number of sites that facilitate Instant Messaging. It’s already common practice since users have discovered ways around texting that may be metered by the message, character or byte. These IMs may show as web traffic but incoming/outgoing web traffic could be ongoing even when the phone was not in the user’s hands (e.g. Pandora music streaming).


11 posted on 06/30/2010 7:13:28 AM PDT by relictele (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

Oh, good Lord!


12 posted on 06/30/2010 7:15:22 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

Ditto what you said.


13 posted on 06/30/2010 7:22:12 AM PDT by devane617 (VOTE THEM OUT! ALL OF THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: devane617

The fact that such a law even has to be considered is scary as hell. Only a complete MORON would type something while he drives. Georgia was forced to pass a “morons should not drive” law. Incredible.


14 posted on 06/30/2010 8:28:14 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Amateur radio exception? I doubt it.


15 posted on 06/30/2010 9:01:43 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (There is no "common good" which minimizes or sacrifices the individual. --Walter Scott Hudson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson