And can I carry it with me wherever I go?
How many handguns per household will the criminals be restricted to?
Any more than that and they start becoming a public nuisance, and over time, a danger to the public safety...
They’ve had hundreds of people shot over the past couple of months, and they’re worried about the law abiding citizens?
It’s none of the City’s BUSINESS HOW many handgun’s, or shotgun’s, or rifles, or any other weapons I have... In fact, the State NOR the Feds need inquire either! It’s called the SECOND AMENDMENT. LOOK IT UP.
What about folks who are ambidextrous?
And what exactly is drawing the line on the number of guns now ? Criminals dont care about gun laws you stupid %^@#s.
This is a rather odd logic.
Perhaps only allowing one roll of toilet paper in the house until the first one is finished works too?
How about allowing only one beer in the house per consumer, until the first one is finished?
How about enforcing one vehicle per citizen?
Or the idea of limiting one guy to one cup of coffee in the morning?
Then there’s the idea of just allowing loser of a newspaper in the City to exist...that’s a pretty decent idea too?
What about the ones for my kids and the cat?
What if a person has a disability and must use a firearm that does not meet the classification of a handgun? I know of one such person who must use a firearm that is technically classified as “any other weapon” or “short barrel rifles or shotguns”.
Guess what... Chicago is looking like a great battleground for the 2nd Amendment Americans with Disabilities Act court case....
So, you keep up the shenanigans Chicago... You’re volunteering to be the dart board again.
Because obviously their handgun ban has worked so well until now.
http://chicago.everyblock.com/crime/by-primary-type/homicide/
And can I carry it with me wherever I go?
One newspaper per city. One TV newscast per city. One telephone per household.
So what happens with people previously convicted of violating gun laws that have now been rendered unconstitutional? Can they appeal their convictions? Or do they have to carry this criminal conviction on their record, a conviction that would deny them lawful gun ownership?
Hmmmm, these jags are really setting themselevs up for beautiful law suits. One gun only. Kind of like allowing newly freed blacks after the civil war to only vote once.
A well armed citizenry is “critical to public safety”, because THAT is the only way to convince punks there is a risk and a consequence to their lifestyle!
It's plural.
Well you’re just allowed one husband at a time so I guess .../sarc
How about a hand gun AND a rifle AND a semi-auto shotgun?
Just askin’
Hows about 1 vote per person?