Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How many times have we been told that the morning after pill DOES NOT cause abortions?
1 posted on 06/29/2010 4:02:57 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 06/29/2010 4:04:34 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 06/29/2010 4:05:02 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Maybe this is why God is allowing us to reap the harvest we are sowing. James Dobson said one year, that the number of babies being sought by infertile couples was the same number as those being aborted [by a mother who didn’t want them-my comment].

So what about the mother of the children that were mistakenly implanted?


4 posted on 06/29/2010 4:06:53 PM PDT by applpie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

All in a day’s work in a culture of death.


5 posted on 06/29/2010 4:07:11 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (barbara walters, celebrity whore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

“Woman Kills Wrongly-Implanted Embryos with Morning-After Pill”

Should read: “Woman Kills Living Human Beings with Morning-After Pill”


6 posted on 06/29/2010 4:08:15 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

yes and what a handle....RU-486....as if a question mark belongs after the name.

despicable.


7 posted on 06/29/2010 4:08:21 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

This going sound cold

Least she cut out the Middleman


9 posted on 06/29/2010 4:12:51 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us ,resistance is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Statistically, it is extremely improbable that the morning-after pill (which is a very high dose of hormonal birth control) could be abortive. The chance is not zero, but it is possible that it could be taken in such a way that it fails at preventing ovulation (depending on where the woman is) or preventing fertilization (the other most common effect) but somehow works to prevent the fertilized egg from implanting. This is technically possible, though only if taken very late relative to sex (near or past the end of the 72-hour window).

The morning-after pill has NEVER been stated to act on an implanted embryo, which is what this story claims. If this is true, this would be a scandal of massive proportions. The way this story is written makes the events impossible by known science. It’s most likely misreported and the truth is probably the woman took not the morning-after pill but an actual abortifacient like RU-486.


10 posted on 06/29/2010 4:13:36 PM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

See. I hope this “healthcare” is affordable.


14 posted on 06/29/2010 4:34:07 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

“University of Connecticut Health Center has agreed to pay a $ 3,000 fine over the incident”

pay a fine — that’s it — now move on, nothing to see here.

btw who gets fine monies, not the patient, the govt !!


16 posted on 06/29/2010 4:51:00 PM PDT by George from New England (Escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

What a sad story...once again the innocent are expendable


18 posted on 06/29/2010 5:06:16 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
How many times have we been told that the morning after pill DOES NOT cause abortions?

It doesn't. This woman wasn't pregnant, any more than the test tube the embyro had just come from was "pregnant". She just had an unimplanted embryo floating around loose inside her.

LifeSite is, as usual, distorting facts in the interest of maximum sensationalism. They use the term "implanted" repeatedly in the article, even though they surely know (unless they're just totally clueless about all of this stuff) that the embryo had only been *transferred*. Transfer comes first, and then the hope (in normal cases) is that implantation will subsequently occur (in a few days), but often it doesn't. Same as with natural conceptions -- a fertilized egg floating down the fallopian tube into the uterus may implant at which point the woman becomes pregnant; but very often it does not implant, and the woman never becomes pregnant.

*Nothing* causes abortion in a woman who isn't pregnant.

22 posted on 06/29/2010 5:49:04 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Wonder if she will be charged with murder since, technically, it was not HER right to choose.


26 posted on 06/29/2010 6:13:24 PM PDT by twhitak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

One thing that we have to unfortunately keep in mind is that they have defined pregnancy to begin at implantation, so technically, they can say that the morning after pill and some forms of birth control do not cause abortions because implantation occurs 2 weeks after onception. The life a person starts at conception, so these pills (the morning after especially) do end human lives.


30 posted on 06/29/2010 7:24:28 PM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Just some medical clarification for those who are making wrong assumptions, INCLUDING the author of this article:

A doctor TRANSFERS the embryos into the woman’s uterus. He does not, nor can he, IMPLANT the embryos into the uterus.

Embryos in a uterus might be no good. Their chromosomes are often (roughly 50% of the time) not compatible with growth to the 13th week of pregnancy. Very often, they are not even able to implant for that reason or another, like poor uterine lining or other defects in the uterus. Most embryos finding themselves in a uterus do NOT become babies.

Implantation, or, rather, the hormones the embryo gives off thereafter is the first sign of pregnancy. While the woman being told she had the wrong embryos in her, was pregnant until proven otherwise, no test on earth in those 24 hours could have determined pregnancy in her. Technically, she really wasn’t yet.

The thing with the morning after pill is that no one will ever be able to know whether it caused an abortion or not. It is preventing the living embryo from implantation. I do not believe in such a thing, but I think people need to know the real scoop medically.

Implantation is one of the hardest tasks of an embryo. MOST DO NOT MAKE IT, even when naturally conceived.


39 posted on 06/29/2010 8:00:48 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Shameful. I guess “any” baby wouldn’t do.

What a tangled web we weave, when we try to artificially conceive.


43 posted on 06/29/2010 8:39:29 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Victors study demographics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Bioethicist Wesley J. Smith commented on his blog about the event, saying it illustrates not only how children have come to be treated as a commodity through in vitro fertilization, but also how this process can sometimes snare “would-be birth and biological parents … in terrible, heart wrenching circumstances.”

******************************

And he is right. What a horrible thing has happened here.

49 posted on 06/30/2010 5:41:45 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
A follow-up with the TODAY Show in May, revealed that the baby Carolyn Savage carried to term was born Logan Morell, now approximately 8 months old. The Savages and the Morells have become friends through the painful experience. However the Savages declined to appear on the TODAY Show, saying that the months following Logan’s birth have been much more difficult for them to deal with than they expected, but they hope to write about their experiences in a book for 2011.

What the Savages did was absolutely wonderful, for the other parents and the child. I am sure it is very tough cross to bear but it is also a joyful burden and I am in awe of the love they have shown for this other family and for the Lord. They are inspiring, and may the Good Lord bless them. Alleluia!
78 posted on 06/30/2010 5:55:54 PM PDT by visualops (Proud Air Force Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Pinged from Terri Dailies


82 posted on 07/05/2010 9:38:53 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson