Firstly, the premise is bogus. The recent high court decisions did not expand any gun rights, they merely moved towards reinstating them from facist power grabs.
Secondly, Kagan's statement is so stupid on so many levels. Whether you agree or disagree with the recent rulings the ink is barely dry on the ruling yesterday so how is it actually "settled law", implying some sort of long standing ruling?
The woman needs to be hammered and hammered again to show how wrong she is for the appointment.
“..The woman needs to be hammered and hammered again to show how wrong she is for the appointment...”
She needs to be WALKED OUT ON, BORKED, and CLARENCE-THOMASED by the GOP.
That’s what needs to happen. Good luck with that.
Supreme Court decisions are settled law? Does that mean she disagrees with a former Court’s reversal of the Dred Scott decision?