[boomop1]

The Homer Simpson response doh doh doh, the queen of know nothing.

[Puppage]

Kagan says: Huh?

Deep,legal mind there, boy.

[Tzimisce]

Oh I’m sorry, I meant to ask “Are you a rabid communist?”

[Cheetahcat]

The she/butch/thing will get nominated and the R’s will sit on their hands.

[TheThirdRuffian]

She used to opine that judicial decisions were nothing more than another type of politics.

Now she says her politics would be seperate.

Just like Sotomayer said she supported individual gun rights -— and voted against them.

[Soothesayer9]

The safe answer would have been “no”.

[VRWCmember]

"I honestly don't know what that label means," Kagan told Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama .

Will that answer be ridiculed like Sarah Palin's request for clarification of what Tom Brokaw meant by "Bush Doctrine"?

[throwback]

Maybe it’s a product of the mindset where most liberals tend to think their opinions are the only opinions. Like if you were a rock in a part of the universe that only had rocks, and someone asked you if you were a rock, you might say you didn’t know what a rock was because you’ve never known there could be anything different.

[budwiesest]

Ask her: “Gettin’ laid regular?”

[paul51]

not that we need any more indications off how far this country has fallen, take a look at this SC nominee. I suppose if we can make a community organizer with no practical experience of anything at all POTUS, anything is possible.

[Eagle Eye]

So look at her past decisions and see if they are separate from her politics or not.

Real simple.

What? She has no past decisions??!!

[Stosh]

I’m betting undocumented progressive.

[BenLurkin]

“My politics would be, must be, have to be completely separate from my judging,”

Of course had she ever been a judge this statement could be vetted.

[HighlyOpinionated]

PLEASE . . .

If you have not read Mark Levin's "Liberty and Tyranny" I urge you to do so.

If you HAVE, and you can get into DC to visit your Senator, PLEASE highlight some of the pages that pertain to what's going on in the Senate Hearings and TAKE THE BOOK to your Senator and GIVE IT TO HIM/HER.

If you cannot get to DC, EMAIL the page numbers and paragraph numbers that you suggest your Senator read.

Mark Levin has hit this Administration's coffin nail on the head, especially where it pertains to Obama's and the Statists' "repeat after me" types like Sotomayor and Kagan . . . and Obama's NEXT Supreme Court nominee, CASS SUNSTEIN!

Don't you see the Obama Progression of Progressive Statist SCOTUS Nominees?

Sotomayor
Kagan
Sunstein

It's ALL there, Conservative Patriots!

Obama will do what his EXTREME LEFT WING BASE wants him to do . . .
. . .
. . . but a Republican REFUSES to do what "normal, run of the mill, We The People Conservative Base" request they do.

THEREIN is the problem, my Conservative Patriot friends, most "Republicans" are NEO-STATISTS [and FDR think-alikes]!