Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elbiablobob

I think I heard her say, as I was waking up from a nap, that SCOTUS should rule according to the will of the people and their elected leaders. Did anyone else catch this?


19 posted on 06/28/2010 11:53:54 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SWAMPSNIPER; John Leland 1789
"I think I heard her say, as I was waking up from a nap, that SCOTUS should rule according to the will of the people and their elected leaders. Did anyone else catch this?"

That would not be surprising. It is the *democratic* thing to say.

The horrible truth of the matter is that the majority(by far) of the electorate have no understanding of the fact that this would rend the very fabric of the Republic asunder.

This is the legacy of the NEA, public education and universal suffrage.

We are set for an egalitarian massacre of both our system and our people (literally) ala 1789.

(John, I just realized something about your screen name ... hmmmmm.)
20 posted on 06/29/2010 12:15:16 AM PDT by shibumi ((Topop Gigiop!!!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Yeah I caught it...she felt the Court should concern itself with the desires of its people. How I translated it was that she wanted the Supreme court to be less “traditional and constitution minded” and more progressively activist minded!


27 posted on 06/29/2010 4:33:56 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (Mike Mathis is my name,opinions are my own,subject to flaming when deserved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson