To: elbiablobob
I think I heard her say, as I was waking up from a nap, that SCOTUS should rule according to the will of the people and their elected leaders. Did anyone else catch this?
19 posted on
06/28/2010 11:53:54 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
To: SWAMPSNIPER; John Leland 1789
"I think I heard her say, as I was waking up from a nap, that SCOTUS should rule according to the will of the people and their elected leaders. Did anyone else catch this?"
That would not be surprising. It is the *democratic* thing to say.
The horrible truth of the matter is that the majority(by far) of the electorate have no understanding of the fact that this would rend the very fabric of the Republic asunder.
This is the legacy of the NEA, public education and universal suffrage.
We are set for an egalitarian massacre of both our system and our people (literally) ala 1789.
(John, I just realized something about your screen name ... hmmmmm.)
20 posted on
06/29/2010 12:15:16 AM PDT by
shibumi
((Topop Gigiop!!!!!))
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Yeah I caught it...she felt the Court should concern itself with the desires of its people. How I translated it was that she wanted the Supreme court to be less “traditional and constitution minded” and more progressively activist minded!
27 posted on
06/29/2010 4:33:56 AM PDT by
mdmathis6
(Mike Mathis is my name,opinions are my own,subject to flaming when deserved!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson