Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

She has already said she is against the Arizona immigration law and claims there is a racist tone from the backers of the law.

And it is not just about amnesty that she won’t answer.What about Roe V Wade???? Ban on Assault weapons??? The list goes on and on.

She is going to be the worst of the RINOs..and a Muslim lover as well.

She is for cap and trade, against the immigration law, for internet tax, dont know if she will overturn Roe V Wade because she won’t answer the question, doesn’t own a gun, won’t answer the question about path to citzenship ( as in amnesty because we already have a path to citizenship in the law)..oh and she ran HP into the ground and let it sell product to Iran through a ..ahem...third party.

But Hey, Sarah Palin liked her...so people listened.

And they are going to be sorry.


85 posted on 06/27/2010 7:02:48 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

“Fiorina, Armey, McCain and Palin seem to have found a tight-rope to walk between amnesty and deportation. All state opposition to outright “amnesty” - but all also appear to support some new “pathway to citizenship” or “comprehensive immigration reform” which would allow illegal aliens to stay in the U.S. They also oppose any effort to arrest and deport illegal aliens, or in any way hold illegal migrants accountable to the rule of law.”

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-202561.html


87 posted on 06/27/2010 7:53:48 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Chuck DeVore was not going to be the next Senator from CA—and he’s no longer a candidate for it either. Some Freepers are sorry about Scott Brown now that he’s in for MA, but that’s just not how politics works.

From a broader perspective, Fiorina and, to be fair, Palin, whom I generally back, among too many others in the GOP have taken to that “it’s irresponsible to talk about a path to citizenship until the border is secured” line. Wink, wink.

That’s not good enough for me and I would like to see a forceful but measured effort to demand a higher standard from our pols. It’s mostly too late for that in 2010, since we’re pretty much down to the general election now, but it has got to be a baseline requirement for 2012. The Dems will try to force the issue, perhaps in their upcoming lame duck session, but there should be an orderly, tea party-like response that demands the GOP stand for current immigration law enforcement. Oh, and anchor babies have to go too. I think this could be the major fight we need to gear up for—starting by the second week in November.


88 posted on 06/27/2010 7:57:51 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson