Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/25/2010 5:19:19 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

sad


2 posted on 06/25/2010 5:27:28 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (If November does not turn out well, then beware of December.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

one of the best things for this country would be to rescind he 17th and let the State legislators choose their Senators .


3 posted on 06/25/2010 6:00:34 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
WHAT? People used to ELECT their Senators? Or the State legislatures did?

Wow...I thought Senators are all appointed..."until the Special Election..."



;-)

17 posted on 06/25/2010 8:31:57 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Just another reason why DE’s state government is as useless as &$&# on a boar hog.


19 posted on 06/26/2010 3:37:30 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Just another reason why DE’s state government is as useless as &$&# on a boar hog.


20 posted on 06/26/2010 3:37:51 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There is a sense in which the ratification of the 17th Amendment by Delaware is not moot.
Article V - Amendment Note1 - Note2 - Note3 The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
If you interpret "State" above to mean the government of a State - which is IMHO the clear intent, since prior to the 17th Amendment the governments of the States were what were represented in the Senate - ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment actually required unanimous consent by the States.

22 posted on 06/26/2010 4:21:00 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ( DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; SunkenCiv; fieldmarshaldj; Repeal The 17th; All
IIRC, there is some controversy as to whether a sufficient number of state legislatures had actually ratified the 17th Amendment when it was declared to have been ratified in 1913. (The same is true for the 16th Amendment (income tax), which was declared to have been ratified earlier in 1913.)
46 posted on 07/09/2010 2:26:07 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson