Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Gogness - What is This?
San Angelo Standard Times ^ | June 25, 2010 | Britt Towery

Posted on 06/25/2010 9:04:37 AM PDT by yetidog

From a local feller writing for a declining circulation West Texas wannabe news organization that includes this guy in their stable of "columnists." I read it for the obits and sales. Otherwise useless.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushater; newsworthy

1 posted on 06/25/2010 9:04:44 AM PDT by yetidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yetidog
Gog, Magog And The Iraq Invasion
2 posted on 06/25/2010 9:08:00 AM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yetidog
Oh, my God. Without even reading it I know what you're talking about. I can't read his articles anymore because the paper where I used to read his articles (Brownwood Bulletin) requires a subscription. But I have argued with him directly by email and in the paper.

He's a Jew hater, Palestinian loving, so-called Christian. He has a soft-spoken manner, but you can just hear the seething hatred for the right in everything he writes.
3 posted on 06/25/2010 9:09:48 AM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yetidog
I will leave it to readers, now that you have the facts, what this strange, but plausible, report tells us.

That you can't articulate worth a nickel?

4 posted on 06/25/2010 9:11:04 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas_mrs
“Incredibly, President George W. Bush told French President Jacques Chirac, in early 2003, that Iraq must be invaded to thwart Gog and Magog, the Bible’s satanic agents of the Apocalypse.”

This guy's a "cook" (inside joke)
5 posted on 06/25/2010 9:12:51 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

From the “article” (I use the word advisedly):

“He stormed into Iraq claiming it was a “crusade,” ...”

Bush did use the word “crusade” once or twice, until the inflammatory implications of it were pointed out to him, but he certainly never used it in the sense of a religious crusade, as the joker who wrote this piece implies.

And that was enough to tell me what the article as a whole was worth (which is below its value as fishwrap).


6 posted on 06/25/2010 9:14:35 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yetidog
"But in 2007, he includes this stunning story that Bush, in a top-secret phone call"

If this article were written about a Democratic president the entire focus would be on the breaking of a trust from a private conversation, as per Linda Tripp's revelations regarding Monica Lewinsky and President Clinton, we were told the real story there was the betrayal of things told in confidence.

But then, who expects consistency and integrity from liberals such as this little tool, with their self-proclaimed noble cause wherein the ends always justify the means.

7 posted on 06/25/2010 9:18:45 AM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas_mrs

I never argue with anyone to whom a newspaper of any size gives a periodic voice of controversy. It feeds too many ill-formed and needy egos that can only be fed by publically making a fool of oneself by posing as someone (ie. “a columnist”)who thinks they have something important to say.


8 posted on 06/25/2010 9:23:54 AM PDT by yetidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson